fbpx

Under Financial Pressure? Don't Fall Into Dodgy Lenders' Arms!

15th June 2018 By Arman Khosravi

Financial pressure can easily lead the unwary into the arms of unscrupulous lenders. One High Court case, in which numerous borrowers found themselves in legal limbo, shows how unwise it is to enter into such transactions without professional advice.

A businessman had, through his company, operated as what he described as a ‘lender of last resort’, offering high-interest loans to those in financial difficulties. Many of the loans were secured by way of mortgages on borrowers’ homes. In fact, neither the businessman nor his company was properly licensed to lend money and most of the loans were likely to have been invalid.

Once his activities were uncovered, the businessman was, amongst other things, sentenced to three and a half years’ imprisonment for various offences under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. He was also disqualified from acting as a director for 15 years and, after his release, would for five years be subject to a Serious Crime Prevention Order, forbidding him from conducting any business in the credit sphere.

His company had been placed in liquidation and two of the other corporate vehicles through which he operated had been placed under the management of the Official Receiver. Difficulties arose, however, because of the businessman’s purported assignment of the company’s loan book to the corporate vehicles.

Depending on the validity or otherwise of the assignment, it was either the Official Receiver or the liquidators who bore responsibility for dealing with the fallout from the debacle, including the release of mortgages in respect of invalid or fully paid loans. In the meantime, a number of borrowers remained unable to deal with their properties because of the mortgages registered against them.

In resolving the matter, the Court found that the assignment was invalid, having been entered into after the date on which a petition to wind up the company was presented. It was in any event void, having been entered into at an undervalue with the intention of defrauding the company’s creditors. In the circumstances, the loan book remained with the company and it was for the liquidators to take all necessary steps to protect the interests of the borrowers and the company’s creditors.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Tenants Can Purchase Freehold When Landlord Cannot Be Found

11th June, 2024 By

The Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 gives qualifying leaseholders the right to join together to buy the freehold of their properties – a process known as collective enfranchisement. A recent case demonstrated that this right can be exercised even when the landlord cannot be found. The leaseholders of two flats in a terraced house wished to purchase it from the landlord, but were unable to ascertain his whereabouts and therefore could not serve notice on him under Section 13 of the Act. They therefore applied for an...

Court Refuses to Set Aside Divorce Order Applied for by Mistake

6th June, 2024 By

While the courts have a range of powers to set aside orders, they will only exercise them in limited circumstances. In a somewhat surprising case that has attracted much comment, the High Court declined to set aside a final order of divorce that had been applied for by mistake. A couple separated in January 2023, after more than 21 years of marriage. In October that year, while financial remedy proceedings were still ongoing, the wife's legal representatives inadvertently applied for a final order of divorce in respect of her instead...

Waiting Time for Grants of Probate Falls

3rd June, 2024 By

Following concerns last year about delays in processing probate applications, recent figures from HM Courts and Tribunals Service show that waiting times for grants of probate are continuing to improve. The average time from submission of a probate application to probate being granted fell to 11.3 weeks in March 2024, a decrease from 13.7 weeks in February and 13.8 weeks in January. This is the lowest figure since March 2023, when the average was 10.8 weeks. The longest waiting time since then was in November, at 15.8 weeks: that month,...

Late Appeal Against Tax Penalties Rejected

31st May, 2024 By

It is incumbent on taxpayers to make sure they fully comply with their obligations to file returns and pay any tax due. The point was illustrated by a recent case in which a taxpayer whose return had not been received by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) failed to persuade the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) that he should be permitted to appeal against the resulting penalties. On the evening of 31 January 2014, the man had completed his 2012/13 Income Tax return on HMRC's website. Shortly afterwards he went to Cyprus, and...