Challenge to Will's Validity Rejected by High Court

12th April 2024 By

The best way to ensure your assets will be distributed as you wish is to have your will professionally drafted by a qualified solicitor. In a recent case, a challenge to the validity of an elderly man’s will was dismissed by the High Court.

The man had previously made a will in 2011, leaving most of his estate equally to his three children. In 2018, by which time one of his sons had predeceased him, he made a further will, leaving the residue of his estate to his other son and his daughter. He passed away in 2020, at the age of 91. His two surviving children obtained a grant of probate of the 2018 will later that year.

The deceased son’s daughters challenged the validity of the 2018 will and sought an order revoking the grant of probate. They claimed that the man lacked capacity to make the will, that he did not know and approve its contents and that it was made as a result of undue influence or fraudulent calumny. They argued that, up until his death, the man had intended to divide his estate into three shares, one of which would pass to his deceased son’s children.

The Court noted that the man had suffered from a number of health conditions, including emphysema, heart disease and impaired hearing, by the time he made the 2018 will. After hearing evidence from medical experts and from the solicitors who drafted the will, however, it concluded that he had testamentary capacity. In ruling that he also knew and approved the will’s contents, the Court took into account that his two surviving children had also been the intended beneficiaries of a draft will that had been drawn up 18 months earlier, and that the attendance notes made by his solicitor indicated that he had reviewed the 2018 will and confirmed he was happy with it.

The Court also concluded that the various allegations made by the daughters did not come close to persuading it that the 2018 will was procured by undue influence or fraud. The will was therefore valid.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...