fbpx

Solicitors Are Under a Lifelong Duty to Guard Client Confidentiality

11th January 2018 By Arman Khosravi

One of the advantages of placing your trust in solicitors is that they owe a lifelong duty to maintain the confidentiality of any information you give them. That point was underlined by a High Court case in which a solicitor was banned from taking instructions that could conflict with the interests of her former clients.

The solicitor had, for about a year, worked as an in-house lawyer for a property company. During that period, she had access to confidential information concerning the company’s assets and its financial and legal affairs. She had also been retained by the businessman who ran the company to advise him personally.

Surprisingly, she later accepted instructions from a family who were contemplating proceedings against the company and the businessman. Before doing so, she sought guidance from the Solicitors Regulation Authority and had required her prospective clients to sign a waiver, the terms of which had not been disclosed.

In granting an injunction that forbade her from acting for the family in the proposed proceedings, the Court noted that it is of the highest importance to the administration of justice that there must not be even an appearance of solicitors acting in a manner that might put current or former clients’ confidential or privileged information into the hands of those with interests adverse to them.

There could be no doubt that she had come into possession of information that was confidential to the company and the businessman, neither of whom had consented to its disclosure. It was also possible that such information might be relevant to the current dispute. The solicitor had made conscientious attempts to ensure that there would be no conflict of interest, but they had not avoided, or even reduced, the risk that she might make subconscious use of confidential information.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Tenants Can Purchase Freehold When Landlord Cannot Be Found

11th June, 2024 By

The Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 gives qualifying leaseholders the right to join together to buy the freehold of their properties – a process known as collective enfranchisement. A recent case demonstrated that this right can be exercised even when the landlord cannot be found. The leaseholders of two flats in a terraced house wished to purchase it from the landlord, but were unable to ascertain his whereabouts and therefore could not serve notice on him under Section 13 of the Act. They therefore applied for an...

Court Refuses to Set Aside Divorce Order Applied for by Mistake

6th June, 2024 By

While the courts have a range of powers to set aside orders, they will only exercise them in limited circumstances. In a somewhat surprising case that has attracted much comment, the High Court declined to set aside a final order of divorce that had been applied for by mistake. A couple separated in January 2023, after more than 21 years of marriage. In October that year, while financial remedy proceedings were still ongoing, the wife's legal representatives inadvertently applied for a final order of divorce in respect of her instead...

Waiting Time for Grants of Probate Falls

3rd June, 2024 By

Following concerns last year about delays in processing probate applications, recent figures from HM Courts and Tribunals Service show that waiting times for grants of probate are continuing to improve. The average time from submission of a probate application to probate being granted fell to 11.3 weeks in March 2024, a decrease from 13.7 weeks in February and 13.8 weeks in January. This is the lowest figure since March 2023, when the average was 10.8 weeks. The longest waiting time since then was in November, at 15.8 weeks: that month,...

Late Appeal Against Tax Penalties Rejected

31st May, 2024 By

It is incumbent on taxpayers to make sure they fully comply with their obligations to file returns and pay any tax due. The point was illustrated by a recent case in which a taxpayer whose return had not been received by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) failed to persuade the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) that he should be permitted to appeal against the resulting penalties. On the evening of 31 January 2014, the man had completed his 2012/13 Income Tax return on HMRC's website. Shortly afterwards he went to Cyprus, and...