fbpx

Prisoner Unlawfully Evicted from Housing Association Flat Wins Damages

1st March 2024 By

The concept of unlawful eviction may bring to mind a picture of a malign landlord changing the locks and throwing a vulnerable tenant onto the street. However, a case in which a serving prisoner’s protected tenancy was wrongfully terminated during his absence behind bars showed that it more commonly arises from a landlord’s muddled understanding of the law.

The man had for some years held an assured tenancy of a housing association flat. After he was convicted of serious drug offences, he received a 22-year jail term. His wife remained living in the flat with their young child. Their marriage did not survive his incarceration and, following their divorce, the wife and child moved to another property. The flat was subsequently re-let.

In upholding the man’s unlawful eviction claim, the High Court found that nothing he said, wrote or did following his imprisonment amounted to an unequivocal surrender of his tenancy, which was protected under the Housing Act 1988. Although he was keen to add his wife to his tenancy so that she and their child could retain the roof over their heads, he never offered to give up his own right to possession of the flat. His landlord had no entitlement to treat his tenancy as at an end.

The Court noted that it is rare for social landlords unlawfully to evict their tenants. When they do so, it is usually a result of honest misjudgment and scarcely ever arises from a deliberate intention to act unlawfully. Standing back, the evidence painted a picture of hopeless muddle and seeming administrative and managerial incompetence on the landlord’s part. There was a lack of clarity as to what should be done, what was being done and why, in response to the man’s imprisonment.

In awarding him £145,800 in damages and interest, the Court noted that he had been punished for his crimes to the full extent of the law. His tenancy enjoyed security of tenure and it did not follow from the fact of his offending that his landlord was in any way justified in unlawfully depriving him of his home.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Tenants Can Purchase Freehold When Landlord Cannot Be Found

11th June, 2024 By

The Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 gives qualifying leaseholders the right to join together to buy the freehold of their properties – a process known as collective enfranchisement. A recent case demonstrated that this right can be exercised even when the landlord cannot be found. The leaseholders of two flats in a terraced house wished to purchase it from the landlord, but were unable to ascertain his whereabouts and therefore could not serve notice on him under Section 13 of the Act. They therefore applied for an...

Court Refuses to Set Aside Divorce Order Applied for by Mistake

6th June, 2024 By

While the courts have a range of powers to set aside orders, they will only exercise them in limited circumstances. In a somewhat surprising case that has attracted much comment, the High Court declined to set aside a final order of divorce that had been applied for by mistake. A couple separated in January 2023, after more than 21 years of marriage. In October that year, while financial remedy proceedings were still ongoing, the wife's legal representatives inadvertently applied for a final order of divorce in respect of her instead...

Waiting Time for Grants of Probate Falls

3rd June, 2024 By

Following concerns last year about delays in processing probate applications, recent figures from HM Courts and Tribunals Service show that waiting times for grants of probate are continuing to improve. The average time from submission of a probate application to probate being granted fell to 11.3 weeks in March 2024, a decrease from 13.7 weeks in February and 13.8 weeks in January. This is the lowest figure since March 2023, when the average was 10.8 weeks. The longest waiting time since then was in November, at 15.8 weeks: that month,...

Late Appeal Against Tax Penalties Rejected

31st May, 2024 By

It is incumbent on taxpayers to make sure they fully comply with their obligations to file returns and pay any tax due. The point was illustrated by a recent case in which a taxpayer whose return had not been received by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) failed to persuade the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) that he should be permitted to appeal against the resulting penalties. On the evening of 31 January 2014, the man had completed his 2012/13 Income Tax return on HMRC's website. Shortly afterwards he went to Cyprus, and...