fbpx

COVID-19 – High Court Authorises Vaccination of Elderly Dementia Sufferer

12th April 2021 By

Should vulnerable people who lack the mental capacity to make important decisions for themselves be vaccinated against COVID-19 even in the face of objections from their loved ones? The High Court confronted that uniquely difficult issue in the case of an 80-year-old care home resident who was suffering from dementia.

The woman’s son did not object to vaccination in principle but was deeply sceptical about the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines and the speed at which they had been authorised for use. In opposing her vaccination, he argued that her wishes and feelings had not been adequately canvassed. In those circumstances, the local authority that bore responsibility for her care sought judicial guidance.

Ruling on the matter, the Court found that, by reason of her dementia, the woman lacked the capacity to decide for herself whether she should receive a COVID-19 vaccine. She was unable to understand information concerning the existence of the virus and the potential danger it posed to her health. She could not retain information for long enough to enable her to weigh up the advantages and disadvantages of vaccination.

In seeking to ascertain what her wishes and feelings might be, the Court noted that she had willingly received the influenza vaccine in the past. She had been generally compliant with public health advice and had exhibited trust in the medical profession. When asked by a GP whether she wanted to be vaccinated, she responded that he should take whatever course was best for her.

The Court emphasised that her right to autonomy was not eclipsed by her dementia. Whilst respecting the son’s right to his own views, it found that they were a facet of his own temperament and personality and did not reflect his mother’s more placid and sociable character. It was her approach to life, rather than that of her son, on which the Court was required to focus.

Authorising the woman’s vaccination, the Court noted that the UK has one of the highest death rates per capita due to COVID-19 in the world. There had been a recent outbreak of the virus at the care home where the woman lived. COVID-19 posed a grave threat to her health and ultimately her life, and such risks decisively outweighed the unidentified possibility of her suffering an adverse reaction to the vaccine.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Company Owner's Negligible Value Claim Unsuccessful

29th April, 2024 By

When an asset falls in value to the point that it is almost worthless, it may be possible to make a negligible value claim under Section 24 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992. The asset will then be treated as if it had been sold and immediately acquired again, so that the loss can be set off against other income. For a claim to succeed, however, the asset must have become of negligible value during the time the claimant owned it. On 30 September 2017, a woman who...

Court Sanctions Leg Amputation for Man Lacking Mental Capacity

24th April, 2024 By

The courts are often called upon to sanction treatment for patients whose ability to make decisions for themselves is impaired. In a recent case on point, the Court of Protection had to decide whether it was in the best interests of a man with mental health issues to have his right leg amputated above the knee. The man, aged 60, was taken to hospital by his niece. He was found to have an ulcerated leg. He had a history of paranoid schizophrenia, and believed that the sores on his leg...

High Court Grants Parental Order Despite Previous Adoption

18th April, 2024 By

In law, adopted children are regarded as having been born to their adoptive parents. The Family Division of the High Court recently considered whether that fact precluded a parental order being granted under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (HFEA) in respect of a child born via surrogacy. A couple who lived in the USA had entered into a surrogacy arrangement with another woman. An adoption order naming the couple as the child's parents had been made by a US court and was automatically recognised under UK law. However,...

Flat Owner Not Liable for Pre-existing Structural Issues

16th April, 2024 By

When building owners carry out works on their property, are they liable for damage to adjoining properties that results from pre-existing structural issues? The Court of Appeal recently provided welcome clarification on that question. The owner of a ground-floor flat wished to extend it by building out into his garden. He served notices on owners of adjoining properties, as required by the Party Wall etc. Act 1996. The works caused the rear wall of two adjoining properties to drop by about 2 mm, which led to internal walls and floor...