fbpx

Company Owner's Negligible Value Claim Unsuccessful

29th April 2024 By

When an asset falls in value to the point that it is almost worthless, it may be possible to make a negligible value claim under Section 24 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992. The asset will then be treated as if it had been sold and immediately acquired again, so that the loss can be set off against other income. For a claim to succeed, however, the asset must have become of negligible value during the time the claimant owned it.

On 30 September 2017, a woman who was one of two directors and shareholders of a restaurant company applied for £150,000 of shares in it at a value of £1 each, to be paid for by converting director’s loans into capital. The following year, she submitted tax returns which included a negligible value claim of £150,000 in respect of the shares, setting off £100,000 of the loss against her income for the 2016/17 and 2017/18 tax years. HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) disallowed the claim on the grounds that the shares were already worthless when she applied for them.

The woman challenged HMRC’s decision before the First-tier Tribunal (FTT). While it was common ground that the shares were worthless on 30 September 2017, she argued that the relevant date was when she had introduced her capital into the business, not when that capital was converted into shares. She contended that the asset which had become of negligible value was a right to acquire the shares, rather than the shares themselves.

The FTT observed that when making a negligible value claim, it is necessary to identify the relevant asset. The asset identified on her tax returns was the shares. The FTT found that funds she had contributed to the company were loans and did not give her a right to acquire shares in it. Her appeal was dismissed.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...