fbpx

Grenfell Tower Inquiry Summary Report

1st October 2020 By Arman Khosravi

Oliver Fisher Solicitors are currently instructed in the Grenfell Tower Inquiry led by Sir Martin Moore-Bick, which is examining the catastrophic fire in June 2017 which claimed 72 lives and injured many others. The Inquiry opened in September 2017 and is now in its second phase.

The first phase of the Inquiry examined events on the night of the fire. Evidence was heard from survivors, emergency services personnel, survivors of the fire and bereaved family members. Phase 1 of the Inquiry investigated how the fire started, how it spread, and the response of emergency services.

The phase one report was published, which made recommendations to the central government, and contained criticisms of several organisations, including London Fire Brigade. The government has said that it will implement the measures recommended by Sir Martin Moore-Bick but has not yet done so.

The second phase of the Inquiry began in February 2020 with the purpose of examining events leading up to the fire. This includes the refurbishment of the building, testing of the cladding, building regulations, and the role of central and local government.

Difficulties arose at the beginning of Phase 2, after one of the panel members selected to assist the Chairman was found to have connections with the firm which manufactured and supplied the cladding used on Grenfell Tower.

The Inquiry was then delayed whilst the Attorney General considered and approved an application from some of the corporate core participants, who sought an undertaking that anything said by an individual witness could not be used against them in future criminal proceedings.

In March 2020, the Inquiry was suspended due to COVID-19. A small number of hearings were held in late July, but it was not until 7 September 2020 that phase two of the Inquiry recommenced in full, albeit with remote attendance for all but the Inquiry team.

So far the September hearings have heard evidence from construction firms who worked on Grenfell Tower, including Rydon, the company contracted to undertake the refurbishment work on the building, and Harley, the facades specialist subcontracted by Rydon to design and install the external cladding, and ending with RBKC Building Control being questioned from the end of September.

Oliver Fisher Solicitors’ team for the Grenfell Tower Inquiry is led by Arfan Bhatti. If you are seeking legal advice or representation for an ongoing or future Inquiry, please contact Mr Bhatti here.

 

Latest News

Retired Businessman's Final Will Ruled Invalid

2nd May, 2024 By

Having your will drawn up professionally by a qualified solicitor is always a sensible precaution, especially in later life. In a recent case, the High Court ruled that a retired businessman lacked testamentary capacity when he made a will less than three and a half years before he died at the age of 87. The man and his first wife were married for nearly 40 years and had four children. After her death he married again. In October 2015 he made a new will, revoking in most respects a will...

Company Owner's Negligible Value Claim Unsuccessful

29th April, 2024 By

When an asset falls in value to the point that it is almost worthless, it may be possible to make a negligible value claim under Section 24 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992. The asset will then be treated as if it had been sold and immediately acquired again, so that the loss can be set off against other income. For a claim to succeed, however, the asset must have become of negligible value during the time the claimant owned it. On 30 September 2017, a woman who...

Court Sanctions Leg Amputation for Man Lacking Mental Capacity

24th April, 2024 By

The courts are often called upon to sanction treatment for patients whose ability to make decisions for themselves is impaired. In a recent case on point, the Court of Protection had to decide whether it was in the best interests of a man with mental health issues to have his right leg amputated above the knee. The man, aged 60, was taken to hospital by his niece. He was found to have an ulcerated leg. He had a history of paranoid schizophrenia, and believed that the sores on his leg...

High Court Grants Parental Order Despite Previous Adoption

18th April, 2024 By

In law, adopted children are regarded as having been born to their adoptive parents. The Family Division of the High Court recently considered whether that fact precluded a parental order being granted under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (HFEA) in respect of a child born via surrogacy. A couple who lived in the USA had entered into a surrogacy arrangement with another woman. An adoption order naming the couple as the child's parents had been made by a US court and was automatically recognised under UK law. However,...