Retired Businessman's Final Will Ruled Invalid

2nd May 2024 By

Having your will drawn up professionally by a qualified solicitor is always a sensible precaution, especially in later life. In a recent case, the High Court ruled that a retired businessman lacked testamentary capacity when he made a will less than three and a half years before he died at the age of 87.

The man and his first wife were married for nearly 40 years and had four children. After her death he married again. In October 2015 he made a new will, revoking in most respects a will he had made in 2007. The new will made increased provision for his second wife’s family and reduced the amounts left to his children from his first marriage.

The will took two years to finalise and he had given varying instructions as to its contents. It was not drafted by a qualified solicitor and no steps were taken to ensure he had capacity. He was diagnosed with vascular dementia in 2016 and died in March 2019.

His children challenged the 2015 will on the grounds that he had lacked testamentary capacity and had not known and approved its contents. The Court heard evidence from a number of witnesses and from two consultant psychiatrists, who agreed that the man was suffering from dementia by the time the will was made. It also considered correspondence sent and received by the man.

The Court found that there was real doubt about whether the man had testamentary capacity when the will was executed. Although he was able to carry out tasks requiring varying degrees of executive function in the months before and after it was signed, it was a complex document and the Court was not satisfied that he had understood its nature and effect. Concluding that he did not have testamentary capacity, the Court pronounced against the 2015 will and upheld the 2007 will.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...