fbpx

Trecarrell House Limited v Patricia Rouncefield [2020] EWCA CIV 760 – News

18th June 2020 By Arman Khosravi

Further Insecurity for Renters following Court of Appeal Decision

PRESS RELEASE: Trecarrell House Limited v Patricia Rouncefield [2020] EWCA CIV 760

Today, 18 June 2020, the Court of Appeal handed down judgement in Trecarrell House Limited v Patricia Rouncefield. The case was heard on 29 January 2020 in front of Lord Justice Patten, Lady Justice King and Lord Justice Moylan. A copy of the judgement is available to download here.

The key question in the matter was whether or not a landlord could evict a tenant using the no-faults eviction process (section 21 Housing Act 1988) if he had not served them a Gas Safety Record prior to the tenant occupying the property. The Court of Appeal were also asked to consider whether or not a Gas Safety Check done out of time, as they are meant to be done annually, would prevent a Landlord from evicting his tenant using section 21.

The Court of Appeal concludes as follows:

  • New Tenants need to be served with a Gas Safety Record at the beginning of their tenancy.
  • As long as the Gas Safety Record is provided to the tenant prior to service of the section 21 notice, the notice will be valid.
  • There is no time limit for serving existing tenants with a Gas Safety Record.

The position as to whether or not a Gas Safety Check done out of time is valid is still unclear.

Arfan Bhatti, the Solicitor for Ms Rouncefield, of Oliver Fisher Solicitors said the following:

“Gas Safety affects a large number of tenants across the county. The effect of this judgement means there is little real deterrent against landlords who do not comply with their duties under the Gas Safety Regulations as HSE prosecutions for breaches, unfortunately, remain rare.”

Oliver Fisher Solicitor are seeking permission to appeal.

Ms Rouncefield instructed our Arfan Bhatti who was assisted by our Billy Clerkin. For further information or any queries please contact Arfan Bhatti at arfan@oliverfisher.co.uk or by calling 0203 219 0145.

Latest News

Tenants Can Purchase Freehold When Landlord Cannot Be Found

11th June, 2024 By

The Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 gives qualifying leaseholders the right to join together to buy the freehold of their properties – a process known as collective enfranchisement. A recent case demonstrated that this right can be exercised even when the landlord cannot be found. The leaseholders of two flats in a terraced house wished to purchase it from the landlord, but were unable to ascertain his whereabouts and therefore could not serve notice on him under Section 13 of the Act. They therefore applied for an...

Court Refuses to Set Aside Divorce Order Applied for by Mistake

6th June, 2024 By

While the courts have a range of powers to set aside orders, they will only exercise them in limited circumstances. In a somewhat surprising case that has attracted much comment, the High Court declined to set aside a final order of divorce that had been applied for by mistake. A couple separated in January 2023, after more than 21 years of marriage. In October that year, while financial remedy proceedings were still ongoing, the wife's legal representatives inadvertently applied for a final order of divorce in respect of her instead...

Waiting Time for Grants of Probate Falls

3rd June, 2024 By

Following concerns last year about delays in processing probate applications, recent figures from HM Courts and Tribunals Service show that waiting times for grants of probate are continuing to improve. The average time from submission of a probate application to probate being granted fell to 11.3 weeks in March 2024, a decrease from 13.7 weeks in February and 13.8 weeks in January. This is the lowest figure since March 2023, when the average was 10.8 weeks. The longest waiting time since then was in November, at 15.8 weeks: that month,...

Late Appeal Against Tax Penalties Rejected

31st May, 2024 By

It is incumbent on taxpayers to make sure they fully comply with their obligations to file returns and pay any tax due. The point was illustrated by a recent case in which a taxpayer whose return had not been received by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) failed to persuade the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) that he should be permitted to appeal against the resulting penalties. On the evening of 31 January 2014, the man had completed his 2012/13 Income Tax return on HMRC's website. Shortly afterwards he went to Cyprus, and...