fbpx

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple’s home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place.

The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about 60 per cent of the proceeds of sale of the former matrimonial home, in which the husband was living. The wife also sought maintenance of £750 a month pending the sale: the husband opposed this and sought an immediate clean break. By the time the case was heard, one of the couple’s children was living with both of them while the other two lived with the wife.

The Court took into account the couple’s respective earning capacities. The husband earned about £129,000 a year but had recently been diagnosed with prostate cancer. The wife, though currently unemployed and in receipt of benefits, had until recently earned £92,000 a year and anticipated that she would soon return to work. She believed that she would be able to earn around £70,000 a year while also caring for the children.

Noting that the other two children might spend time with the husband in the future, the Court considered that the couple had similar housing needs. The husband was likely to continue working notwithstanding his health issues, and the wife would return to work in the foreseeable future.

The Court ruled that, on the sale of the former matrimonial home, the husband should receive £25,000 and the wife £48,000 to cover debts. Of the remaining equity of £413,000, 53.5 per cent would go to the husband and 46.5 per cent to the wife. The wife would receive maintenance of £750 a month until the sale, at which point a clean break would be achieved. The Court subsequently determined that a lump sum should be paid in lieu of the maintenance payments, to prevent their being affected by her receipt of benefits.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Tenants Can Purchase Freehold When Landlord Cannot Be Found

11th June, 2024 By

The Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 gives qualifying leaseholders the right to join together to buy the freehold of their properties – a process known as collective enfranchisement. A recent case demonstrated that this right can be exercised even when the landlord cannot be found. The leaseholders of two flats in a terraced house wished to purchase it from the landlord, but were unable to ascertain his whereabouts and therefore could not serve notice on him under Section 13 of the Act. They therefore applied for an...

Court Refuses to Set Aside Divorce Order Applied for by Mistake

6th June, 2024 By

While the courts have a range of powers to set aside orders, they will only exercise them in limited circumstances. In a somewhat surprising case that has attracted much comment, the High Court declined to set aside a final order of divorce that had been applied for by mistake. A couple separated in January 2023, after more than 21 years of marriage. In October that year, while financial remedy proceedings were still ongoing, the wife's legal representatives inadvertently applied for a final order of divorce in respect of her instead...

Waiting Time for Grants of Probate Falls

3rd June, 2024 By

Following concerns last year about delays in processing probate applications, recent figures from HM Courts and Tribunals Service show that waiting times for grants of probate are continuing to improve. The average time from submission of a probate application to probate being granted fell to 11.3 weeks in March 2024, a decrease from 13.7 weeks in February and 13.8 weeks in January. This is the lowest figure since March 2023, when the average was 10.8 weeks. The longest waiting time since then was in November, at 15.8 weeks: that month,...

Late Appeal Against Tax Penalties Rejected

31st May, 2024 By

It is incumbent on taxpayers to make sure they fully comply with their obligations to file returns and pay any tax due. The point was illustrated by a recent case in which a taxpayer whose return had not been received by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) failed to persuade the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) that he should be permitted to appeal against the resulting penalties. On the evening of 31 January 2014, the man had completed his 2012/13 Income Tax return on HMRC's website. Shortly afterwards he went to Cyprus, and...