fbpx

Inheritance – Your Right to Seek Reasonable Provision Dies With You

21st December 2023 By

If you have not been reasonably provided for in a loved one’s will, the law may come to your aid. However, as a High Court ruling made plain, your ability to seek legal redress cannot itself be inherited and will expire on your death.

Following the deaths of his adoptive parents, a son launched proceedings under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 asserting that they had not made reasonable provision for him in their wills. The son sadly died before his case could come to court and his widow thereafter sought to pursue the claim on behalf of his estate.

Dismissing the claim, the Court found that the right to apply for reasonable provision from a deceased person’s estate is purely personal to the applicant and is incapable of being further pursued following their death. The objective of the Act is to ensure that family members and dependants receive such financial provision as is reasonably required for their maintenance. Any such need for maintenance, the Court observed, plainly ceases on the applicant’s death.

In further seeking to pursue a claim for reasonable provision in her own right, the widow asserted that her parents-in-law had treated her as a child of the family. They had, she argued, developed a relationship of mutual dependency. They had provided her and her husband with financial support when needed and, just as a daughter would do, she had provided them with care and company in their final years.

In striking out her claim, however, the Court found that there was nothing in their relationship which went beyond the usual display of affection, kindness and hospitality between parents and the spouse of their child. She had not been treated as a child of the family in her own right and thus did not fall within the limited category of those who can bring proceedings under the Act.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...