fbpx

Going Into Business with a Loved One? Don't Dispense with Legal Formality

27th December 2023 By

Couples who run businesses together are often tempted to dispense with paperwork and rely solely on trust. As a High Court ruling showed, however, any relationship may come to an end, leaving both sides wishing they had taken a more formal approach at the outset.

The case concerned a couple whose relationship lasted for about 18 years before ending unhappily. Whilst they were together, they established a company through which a buy-to-let property was purchased. She provided finance and administrative services whilst he was responsible for refurbishing the property.

They each had a 50 per cent stake in the company, which was a joint venture taking the form of a quasi-partnership. However, their business relationship was never the subject of a formal shareholders’ agreement. Neither of them had a written contract governing their roles as directors or the terms on which the company employed them.

Despite the end of their relationship, they remained uncomfortably locked together in the business. Each of them accused the other of excluding them from the company’s management and acting to its detriment. She lodged a petition under Section 994 of the Companies Act 2006, asserting that he had taken steps which unfairly prejudiced her position as a shareholder.

Ruling on the matter, the Court rejected a number of her allegations. In upholding her petition, however, it found that he had in some respects impeded the smooth running of the company and acted in a way that was potentially detrimental to its success. His counterclaim, in which he made similar allegations against her, was dismissed.

Subject to hearing further submissions, the Court proposed an order whereby he would be removed as a director of the company and she would be entitled to buy out his shareholding at a price to be fixed by an expert valuer. She would be given credit for over £200,000 owed to her by the company on her director’s loan account. The Court hoped that its decision would enable the former couple to draw a line under their disputes and make a fresh start.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...