fbpx

COVID-19 Crisis Forces Change to UK IHT Payments and Returns Processes

12th June 2020 By

HMRC are scrapping cheques for the payment and repayment of Inheritance Tax (IHT) and temporarily accepting printed signatures on IHT returns, as a result of the coronavirus crisis.

The introduction of new ways of processing IHT and returns is to reduce delays to its service at this time.

The normal process for signing the IHT account requires all legal personal representatives or trustees physically to sign the form IHT400 and IHT100, but in response to self-isolation and social distancing measures now in place to tackle the spread of COVID-19, HMRC are temporarily accepting printed signatures on IHT returns.

The names and other personal details of the personal representatives or trustees must be shown on the declaration page, and the account must include a clear and unambiguous statement from the agent to confirm that all the personal representatives or trustees have seen the IHT account and have agreed to be bound by the declaration.

HMRC have also offered guidance on the wording needed to help ensure that all forms are accepted, suggesting the following structure:

"As the agent acting on their behalf, I confirm that all the people whose names appear on the declaration page of this Inheritance Tax Account have both:

  • seen the Inheritance Tax Account;
  • agreed to be bound by the declaration on (page 14 of the IHT400) or (page 8 of the IHT100)."

HMRC will no longer accept payment of IHT by cheque, nor will they issue cheques or payable orders for the repayment of IHT. The tax must now be paid by any of the other methods specified in its guidance, namely using online or telephone banking, CHAPS or Bacs or at a bank or building society.

Repayments will be made direct to a named bank account using the Faster Payments Service.

To receive a repayment, the payee details must be sent to HMRC in a letter signed by all the signatories to the IHT400 or IHT100. This letter must be headed ‘Repayment – further details’.

The GOV.UK website provides further information on paying IHT.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...