fbpx

‘Daddy touched me’: The Family Court’s Approach to Child Sexual Abuse Allegations in Re C [2022] EWFC 138

29th November 2022 By Arman Khosravi

‘Daddy touched me’: The Family Court’s Approach to Child Sexual Abuse Allegations in Re C [2022] EWFC 138

 

A recent judgment from HHJ Clive Baker outlined how parents and professionals should respond when a child makes an allegation of sexual abuse against a parent.

This case was about a 4-year-old girl who told her mother that her father had touched her inappropriately whilst she was being looked after by him after school one day. The mother told the police who came to ask the child questions about the inappropriate touching the next day. The child was also taken to her doctor for an examination which found redness to the genital area.

In these circumstances, Child Protection professionals recommended that the child be interviewed by specially trained professionals to Achieve Best Evidence (‘ABE’). This usually should be carried out as soon as possible but, in this case, did not occur until 2 and a half months later. A delay such as this is likely to reduce the reliability and the quality of the evidence.

After the allegations were made, the father was arrested and released on bail. The police investigation against him was dropped. Having not seen his child for several months by this stage, the father issued private proceedings.

At the Fact Finding Hearing, the judge felt that the mother was honest about what she had been told by the child and that she was acting to protect her. However, the judge concluded that the father had not sexually abuse the child.

Judge Baker made it clear that it is normal for parents to touch their children. This happens when dressing a child, cleaning a child, playing with a child, and bathing a child. What makes the touching sexual abuse is when:

  1. The touching is not justified, necessary, nor reasonably explained, and
  2. The touching leads to a parent hoping to feel or feeling sexual gratification.[1]

The judge regretted that it had taken almost a year since the allegations were made for proceedings to come to an end and criticized the child protection professionals for failing to act quickly enough.

The judge recommended that when a child makes allegations about sexual abuse against a parent:

  • Professionals must ensure that the child is ABE interviewed as soon as possible;
  • Professionals should consider the case in its whole context by exploring what evidence exists to support the allegations early on in the case;
  • Professionals should carry out risk assessments urgently to avoid irreparable damage to the child and parent’s relations where contact ceases;
  • Professionals should act swiftly to avoid delay in the case being dealt with by the family justice system;
  • Parents should make sure their child sees child protection professionals as soon as possible; and,
  • Where there are physical signs of sexual abuse, parents should take their child to their pediatrician or a medical professional as soon as the signs appear.

Our children’s team at Oliver Fisher is very confident dealing with complex family matters, give us a call on 0203 219 0145 if you would like to know more!

Nicole Wallace

Family Paralegal

 

[1] Paragraph [41]

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...