Working From Home? Do You Have the Right?

25th May 2018 By Arman Khosravi

Although they may not know it, many householders are banned by restrictions in their title deeds from using their properties for commercial purposes. Recently, a man who converted his garage into a dog grooming parlour discovered why he should have sought legal advice before setting up a business in his home.

The man’s home was part of a recently built estate. On transferring the properties to their new owners, the developer had imposed a restrictive covenant requiring that they should not be used for any trade or business. The man was unaware of that restriction when he obtained planning permission, carried out extensive works on his garage and opened his canine business to customers.

On discovering his mistake, he applied to have the restriction discharged on the basis that it was obsolete. He had written to all his neighbours and none of them had objected to his application. On that basis, he submitted that his business was not causing anyone any harm.

In refusing to lift the restriction, however, the Upper Tribunal (UT) noted that an absence of objections does not amount to consent. The restriction served a real purpose and the man had not established that there had been any material change in the character of the neighbourhood since it was imposed.

Granting his application might also set a damaging precedent, effectively giving carte blanche for other businesses to open on the estate and undermining his neighbours’ ability to object. The UT was, however, prepared to modify the restriction, but only to the extent required to enable the man’s business to continue. In order to maintain the protection that the restriction afforded to his neighbours, the modification was made personal to him alone so cannot be passed on to anyone else.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Challenge to Will's Validity Rejected by High Court

12th April, 2024 By

The best way to ensure your assets will be distributed as you wish is to have your will professionally drafted by a qualified solicitor. In a recent case, a challenge to the validity of an elderly man's will was dismissed by the High Court. The man had previously made a will in 2011, leaving most of his estate equally to his three children. In 2018, by which time one of his sons had predeceased him, he made a further will, leaving the residue of his estate to his other son...

Defiance of Family Court Orders Will Always End Badly

10th April, 2024 By

Custodial sentences very rarely come into play in the family courts. Where there have been repeated breaches of court orders, however, judges may have little choice but to clamp down. This was illustrated in the High Court during committal proceedings that stemmed from a child custody dispute. The background to the case involved contested proceedings between the father and mother of a young child. These concluded with a court order establishing that the child – a daughter – would live with the mother. Three months later the daughter travelled with...

Claim for SDLT Relief on Annex Unsuccessful

8th April, 2024 By

When buying a property consisting of more than one residence, it may be possible to claim multiple dwellings relief (MDR) against Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT). However, there are certain conditions that must be met for an MDR claim to succeed, as a recent case illustrates. A property was purchased for £1.8 million. Prior to the purchase, the buyer had agreed with the seller that he would be allowed to carry out works to construct a self-contained annex at the property. The buyer's SDLT return included a claim for MDR...

Divorce – Alleged Bigamy Raised in Financial Remedies Dispute

5th April, 2024 By

The issue of bigamy and its potential impact on a person's ability to seek financial remedies in a divorce came under the legal spotlight recently. A husband made an application to strike out his wife's financial remedies claim on the basis that she had committed bigamy and deceived him into a marriage when she knew she was not free to marry. This deceit, he claimed, was so egregious that, as a matter of public policy, she should be debarred from pursuing any claim for financial remedies against him. The husband based...