fbpx

Wife Sees Off Bankruptcy Trustees' Attempt to Sell Off Her Home

9th May 2022 By

When people dispose of assets shortly before having themselves declared bankrupt, it is inevitable that eyebrows will often be raised. However, as a judge’s ruling showed, it is one thing to allege an improper motive and quite another to prove it.

The case concerned a businessman who transferred a 50 per cent share in his home to his wife about four months before he was made bankrupt on his own petition. His trustees in bankruptcy questioned the timing of the transaction. They argued that the transfer should be rescinded and 100 per cent of the property vested in them so that it could be sold and the proceeds distributed to his creditors.

Ruling on the matter, the judge noted that the wife did not pay anything for her half share in the property. However, she and the businessman had only quite recently married and she was at the time unaware of his financial difficulties. After selling her own home, she had ploughed about £35,000 of the proceeds into adapting his property into a suitable family home for them and her two sons.

She acted to her detriment in giving up the security of owning her own home and by pooling her resources with those of the businessman. She did so in reliance on their agreement that they would own the property equally. She had for some years paid the mortgage in full and continued to do so after he moved out.

Given their agreement that the property was to be their jointly owned family home, a constructive trust arose in her favour when she moved in. From then on, she had a 50 per cent beneficial interest in the property and the subsequent transfer merely formalised that position. The trustees’ claim was dismissed and the wife was granted the opportunity to buy out their interest in the property.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...