Widow Pays for Delay in Seeking Provision From Her Husband's Estate

18th September 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

If you feel that you have suffered a wrong of any kind, a delay in taking legal action can put paid to your chances of obtaining justice. A widow who was left nothing in her deceased husband’s will found that out to her cost when her hopes of obtaining reasonable financial provision from his estate were dashed.

The couple had been married for 13 years but had separated about a year before the husband died. The wife had lodged a divorce petition, but those proceedings were interrupted by her husband’s death. About a year previously, he had made a new will leaving his entire estate to two of his three children.

The widow eventually launched proceedings under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, seeking reasonable financial provision from his estate. However, a six-month time limit applies to such claims and, that deadline having been missed by about two months, she sought judicial permission to proceed with her case.

She argued that the delay was comparatively trivial and that, being impecunious, she had been reluctant to engage in litigation. It was also submitted that, had she succeeded in divorcing her husband prior to his death, she would probably have been awarded half of his property and assets.

However, in refusing to waive the deadline and dismissing the widow’s claim, the High Court found that she had failed to give an adequate explanation for the delay. She was aware of the time limit even before her husband’s death and knew that time would begin to run when his will was admitted to probate. His beneficiaries were in a precarious financial position and any delay in the administration of their father’s estate would cause them prejudice.

The Court noted that the widow’s claim, although arguable, was not unanswerable. She and her husband had signed a pre-nuptial agreement, by which they agreed that there would be no sharing of any property either of them had acquired before the marriage. The husband’s principal asset, his home, fell into that category.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Inveterate Trespasser Rightly Jailed for Contempt, Court of Appeal Rules

16th October, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

It is in the nature of litigation that the losing party frequently feels that the judge was wrong and the outcome unjust. However, a case in which a householder repeatedly lost his liberty, and ultimately his home, due to his defiance of court orders shows how important it is to accept judicial decisions and move on. The man claimed to enjoy an unrestricted right of way on foot over part of the garden of an adjoining property owned by a social housing provider. His arguments to that effect were rejected...

LPA – Bank Practice

11th October, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

A lasting power of attorney (LPA) is a document that may be used so that the finances or other issues of a person who cannot deal with them themselves may be attended to by a trusted third party – normally a solicitor or a family member. When an LPA is presented to a bank or other financial institution, it appears to have become normal practice that it must be certified and dated by a solicitor or notary on each page of the document.Source: Concious

Raising Cash on the Security of Your Home? Always See a Lawyer First

8th October, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

Many vulnerable people who fall into debt are tempted to raise cash on the security of their homes. However, a case in which an elderly couple came within an ace of losing the roof over their heads stands as a warning to all that such arrangements should never be entered into without first taking professional advice. In response to a newspaper advertisement, the couple, who were in dire financial straits, contacted a company that promised to put them back in the black. After they were persuaded to sign a blank...

Where, If Anywhere, Do the Jet Set Call Home? High Court Gives Guidance

4th October, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

Very rich people often live jet set lifestyles of ceaseless travel, so pinning down the country in which they are domiciled can be a serious challenge. The High Court faced exactly that difficulty in a case concerning the acrimonious breakdown of a relationship between a wealthy divorcee and her boyfriend. The divorcee, who was a woman of immense means, for a number of years enjoyed a lavish and peripatetic lifestyle with her boyfriend, whom she had met at the gym where he worked. After they separated, she launched proceedings against...