Widow Pays for Delay in Seeking Provision From Her Husband's Estate

18th September 2019 By Arman Khosravi

If you feel that you have suffered a wrong of any kind, a delay in taking legal action can put paid to your chances of obtaining justice. A widow who was left nothing in her deceased husband’s will found that out to her cost when her hopes of obtaining reasonable financial provision from his estate were dashed.

The couple had been married for 13 years but had separated about a year before the husband died. The wife had lodged a divorce petition, but those proceedings were interrupted by her husband’s death. About a year previously, he had made a new will leaving his entire estate to two of his three children.

The widow eventually launched proceedings under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, seeking reasonable financial provision from his estate. However, a six-month time limit applies to such claims and, that deadline having been missed by about two months, she sought judicial permission to proceed with her case.

She argued that the delay was comparatively trivial and that, being impecunious, she had been reluctant to engage in litigation. It was also submitted that, had she succeeded in divorcing her husband prior to his death, she would probably have been awarded half of his property and assets.

However, in refusing to waive the deadline and dismissing the widow’s claim, the High Court found that she had failed to give an adequate explanation for the delay. She was aware of the time limit even before her husband’s death and knew that time would begin to run when his will was admitted to probate. His beneficiaries were in a precarious financial position and any delay in the administration of their father’s estate would cause them prejudice.

The Court noted that the widow’s claim, although arguable, was not unanswerable. She and her husband had signed a pre-nuptial agreement, by which they agreed that there would be no sharing of any property either of them had acquired before the marriage. The husband’s principal asset, his home, fell into that category.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Always Take Independent Professional Advice Before Investing Your Money

27th May, 2020 By

Fraudulent investment schemes are perennially tempting to the unwary and it really does make sense to take independent professional advice before parting with your money. In one case, the High Court found compelling evidence that hundreds of small investors had fallen victim to such a scheme. About 240 investors claimed to have been lured into a fraudulent commodity trading scheme by marketing literature which promised exceptionally high, and essentially risk-free, returns. The scheme was promoted by an overseas company that was later dissolved. After the scheme was closed, the majority...

Do Your Medical Records Stay Confidential Forever?

22nd May, 2020 By

Your privacy rights will die with you, but that does not mean that just anyone will be permitted access to your medical records after you are gone. The extent to which such records should remain under wraps post mortem was analysed in a High Court test case. A man believed that his brother had, some years prior to his death, arranged to have samples of his sperm frozen at a fertility clinic. As personal representative of his brother's estate, he asked the clinic to provide him with copies of all...

Cruelly Deceitful Husband Ordered to Pay Betrayed Ex-Wife £2.25 Million

19th May, 2020 By

Where blame, if any, attaches for the breakdown of a marriage is generally irrelevant when it comes to dividing assets following divorce. However, as a cruelly deceitful husband discovered to his cost, bad behaviour can have consequences in that it is hardly likely to endear you to a family judge. The case concerned a couple of Russian origin who had two children during their 25-year marriage. The husband had encouraged his wife to move to the UK with their children whilst he remained in Russia. It came as a complete...

Lordship of the Manor Almost Scuppers Residential Development

14th May, 2020 By

Lordships of the manor, whilst sounding grand, are often viewed as arcane titles with little real significance in terms of property rights. However, that is not always so and, in one High Court case, a lordship which was bought for just £100 almost proved a fatal stumbling block to a proposed residential development. As lords of the manor – a title they had acquired from their father, who bought it in the 1960s – a brother and sister owned the freehold of a scenic common. They grew concerned after the...