fbpx

When Is a Property 'Completed'? DIY House Builder Wins VAT Rebate

3rd April 2020 By

DIY house builders are entitled to refunds of VAT they pay on materials used in their projects. However, as a decision of the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) showed, seeking such rebates is far from straightforward and a strict time limit applies.

A man applied for a VAT refund after self-building a house for himself in the grounds of his father’s home. HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC), however, refused the application on the basis that it had not been made within three months of the property’s completion, as required by the Value Added Tax Regulations 1995.

In appealing against that decision to the FTT, the man argued that his application was in time because it had been made within three months of a formal certificate of completion being issued. He had phoned the HMRC helpline twice and been informed that he should wait until he received a certificate of completion before applying for a rebate.

HMRC argued that completion of the house was achieved at an earlier date on the basis that the man had moved in over a year before making his refund application. Although the house had at that point not been connected to a permanent water supply and had yet to pass a permeability test, it was nevertheless habitable.

In upholding the man’s appeal, the FTT found that, for the purposes of the Regulations, completion of a house takes place when a certificate of completion is issued or, if there is no such certificate, on such other date as may be evidenced by documents produced to HMRC by the taxpayer which HMRC are prepared to accept as satisfactory evidence of completion. As the man’s application was made within the three-month time limit, he was entitled to the refund.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Retired Businessman's Final Will Ruled Invalid

2nd May, 2024 By

Having your will drawn up professionally by a qualified solicitor is always a sensible precaution, especially in later life. In a recent case, the High Court ruled that a retired businessman lacked testamentary capacity when he made a will less than three and a half years before he died at the age of 87. The man and his first wife were married for nearly 40 years and had four children. After her death he married again. In October 2015 he made a new will, revoking in most respects a will...

Company Owner's Negligible Value Claim Unsuccessful

29th April, 2024 By

When an asset falls in value to the point that it is almost worthless, it may be possible to make a negligible value claim under Section 24 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992. The asset will then be treated as if it had been sold and immediately acquired again, so that the loss can be set off against other income. For a claim to succeed, however, the asset must have become of negligible value during the time the claimant owned it. On 30 September 2017, a woman who...

Court Sanctions Leg Amputation for Man Lacking Mental Capacity

24th April, 2024 By

The courts are often called upon to sanction treatment for patients whose ability to make decisions for themselves is impaired. In a recent case on point, the Court of Protection had to decide whether it was in the best interests of a man with mental health issues to have his right leg amputated above the knee. The man, aged 60, was taken to hospital by his niece. He was found to have an ulcerated leg. He had a history of paranoid schizophrenia, and believed that the sores on his leg...

High Court Grants Parental Order Despite Previous Adoption

18th April, 2024 By

In law, adopted children are regarded as having been born to their adoptive parents. The Family Division of the High Court recently considered whether that fact precluded a parental order being granted under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (HFEA) in respect of a child born via surrogacy. A couple who lived in the USA had entered into a surrogacy arrangement with another woman. An adoption order naming the couple as the child's parents had been made by a US court and was automatically recognised under UK law. However,...