fbpx

Vulnerable tenant protected from loss of liberty in noise nuisance dispute

11th August 2020 By Arman Khosravi

This week, Oliver Fisher’s trainee solicitor Olivia Doherty achieved an excellent result under severe time constraints in a noise nuisance dispute.

Details of the noise nuisance dispute

The client, who is considered disabled and suffers with extreme anxiety, depression, and PTSD, faces an anti-social behaviour injunction from his landlord for noise nuisance.

Typically, a client is represented from the beginning of their dispute. But in this instance, Oliver Fisher received instruction with just a week to obtain legal aid and prepare for the hearing.

Ms Doherty successfully obtained legal aid for the civil case. But at the last minute Doherty was notified that the nature of the hearing had changed. The hearing had become a decision as to whether to pursue an injunction or a committal hearing.

As a committal is a criminal not civil proceeding, Ms Doherty had just a day to obtain separate legal aid. And should the judge choose to pursue a committal hearing, the client would face time in prison.

Excellent result for vulnerable tenant

Ms Doherty’s last-minute aid application succeeded based on two key case merits.

  • The client had a potential defence under the 2010 Equality Act, which protects disabled people from unfair treatment.
  • The client was at risk of loss of liberty.

With legal aid obtained, the barrister working with Doherty, Mr Richard Granby, successfully negotiated with the claimant’s barrister to dismiss the committal case. This freed the client from the risk of loss of liberty.

At the hearing, the Judge directed Oliver Fisher to obtain medical evidence to prove the client’s disability. With this evidence, the Equality Act defence can be put forward at the injunction hearing in six weeks’ time.

Solicitor’s feedback

“Getting the committal dismissed was an excellent success for the client, as he could have lost his liberty” says Olivia Doherty.

“We now have the chance to fully prepare for the Injunction trial and with permission to obtain medical evidence, I’m confident that the client will be fairly represented. Given the time constraints we were under, I’m pleased the hearing had an extremely positive outcome.”

To find out more about how Oliver Fisher Solicitors could support you through a noise nuisance dispute, click here. To find out whether you are eligible for legal aid, click here.

Latest News

Court Sanctions Leg Amputation for Man Lacking Mental Capacity

24th April, 2024 By

The courts are often called upon to sanction treatment for patients whose ability to make decisions for themselves is impaired. In a recent case on point, the Court of Protection had to decide whether it was in the best interests of a man with mental health issues to have his right leg amputated above the knee. The man, aged 60, was taken to hospital by his niece. He was found to have an ulcerated leg. He had a history of paranoid schizophrenia, and believed that the sores on his leg...

High Court Grants Parental Order Despite Previous Adoption

18th April, 2024 By

In law, adopted children are regarded as having been born to their adoptive parents. The Family Division of the High Court recently considered whether that fact precluded a parental order being granted under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (HFEA) in respect of a child born via surrogacy. A couple who lived in the USA had entered into a surrogacy arrangement with another woman. An adoption order naming the couple as the child's parents had been made by a US court and was automatically recognised under UK law. However,...

Flat Owner Not Liable for Pre-existing Structural Issues

16th April, 2024 By

When building owners carry out works on their property, are they liable for damage to adjoining properties that results from pre-existing structural issues? The Court of Appeal recently provided welcome clarification on that question. The owner of a ground-floor flat wished to extend it by building out into his garden. He served notices on owners of adjoining properties, as required by the Party Wall etc. Act 1996. The works caused the rear wall of two adjoining properties to drop by about 2 mm, which led to internal walls and floor...

Challenge to Will's Validity Rejected by High Court

12th April, 2024 By

The best way to ensure your assets will be distributed as you wish is to have your will professionally drafted by a qualified solicitor. In a recent case, a challenge to the validity of an elderly man's will was dismissed by the High Court. The man had previously made a will in 2011, leaving most of his estate equally to his three children. In 2018, by which time one of his sons had predeceased him, he made a further will, leaving the residue of his estate to his other son...