Tribunal Excludes Furnished Lettings Business from Inheritance Tax Relief

23rd April 2021 By

In a ruling of interest to anyone engaged in renting out furnished properties, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) has taken a restrictive approach to the circumstances in which such enterprises may qualify for Business Property Relief (BPR) from Inheritance Tax (IHT).

The case concerned a house set in scenic grounds which had been converted into five flats. The owner and occupier of one of the flats also owned three of the others which he rented out as furnished holiday accommodation. Following his death, his executors’ claim for BPR in respect of the lettings business was rejected by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC). With more than £220,000 in IHT at stake, the executors challenged that decision before the FTT.

The executors pointed out that the flats were advertised widely for rent in the press, on the internet and via a dedicated website. They were let on a short-term basis to holidaymakers, festival-goers and wedding guests who made use of the grounds. The man and his wife were heavily engaged in the business, expending more than 1,200 hours on managing it annually. It was argued that the business was akin to that of running a hotel or motel.

Dismissing the appeal, however, the FTT preferred HMRC’s arguments that the business mainly consisted of holding or making investments. As such, it was excluded from the benefit of BPR by operation of Section 105(3) of the Inheritance Tax Act 1984.

The FTT noted that investment activities associated with the business included the provision of the accommodation, parking spaces, fixtures and fittings, together with the performance of repairs and maintenance and such administrative tasks as dealing with bookings and advertising.

Incidental or ancillary activities, such as the provision of utilities, appliances, kitchen utensils and consumables, were an integral part of the investment activity of providing the accommodation. Non-investment activities, including the provision of books and leisure equipment to guests, were so insignificant as to be negligible. Overall, the lettings business fell firmly on the investment side of the line and BPR was therefore unavailable.

Source: Concious

Latest News

British Child's Inheritance of Italian Property Creates Legal Quandary

10th May, 2021 By

Where a British child inherits foreign property, tricky legal issues can arise. However, as one case showed, English judges are well able to deal with such difficulties by applying the overriding principle that the child's welfare is always paramount. The case involved an 11-year-old boy whose father died without making a will. Under Italian law, he automatically inherited a 25 per cent share in an Italian holiday home owned by his parents. His mother, who held 75 per cent of the property, wished to sell it at a good price...

Defamed on Social Media? You Don't Have to Put Up With It

7th May, 2021 By

Wounding statements that can have a devastating impact on your professional and personal life take moments to type but can spread like wildfire on the internet. As a High Court case concerning two sports journalists showed, however, lawyers can move fast to ensure your reputation is vindicated. A journalist took legal action after a number of posts appeared on social media. They were the work of a rival sports writer. They clearly referred to him and, amongst other things, accused him of being a shameless liar and cheat who had...

Husband in £64 Million Divorce Case Claims COVID-19 Hardship

4th May, 2021 By

COVID-19 has without doubt drastically affected the fortunes of some very wealthy people. As a High Court ruling in a big money divorce case showed, however, the pandemic does not by itself amount to a good reason for failing to meet legal and financial obligations. The case concerned an extraordinarily wealthy businessman who was ordered to pay his ex-wife a total of £64 million, comprising the mortgage-free matrimonial home, which was worth £15 million, and a lump sum of £49 million. The order, amongst other things, set deadlines by which...

Confronting Mortality – Professional Advice Helps Produce Order from Chaos

28th April, 2021 By

Confronting mortality is never easy and many people put off making decisions critical to their own future, and that of their loved ones, until after the onset of serious illness or old age. Such a course involves serious legal risks but, as a High Court case showed, they can be effectively offset by taking professional advice. The case concerned a woman who died at the age of 60 after enduring many years of ill health, including two strokes. Four years previously, she had purchased her home at a discounted price...