Tribunal Comes to Aid of Dutiful Son Penalised for Late Payment of Tax

21st August 2020 By

Prioritising prompt payment of your tax bills can be tough, particularly when there are other compelling and unforeseen demands on your limited resources. In a case on point, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) came to the aid of a man who dipped into his tax reserve to pay for his elderly mother’s care after she suffered a stroke.

After his mother fell ill, the man had to move to be closer to her. She had insufficient income to pay all of her nursing home fees so, with no support from his siblings, he stepped in to top them up. At around the same time, he lost his job as a consultant and subsequently had to take lower-paid work as a delivery driver. His daughter was facing a criminal investigation and that, combined with other family difficulties, had plunged him into depression. In order to pay for his mother’s care, he resorted to money that he had sensibly set aside to pay tax.

After his payment of more than £8,000 in tax and National Insurance Contributions was delayed, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) levied late payment penalties totalling 15 per cent of the tax due. He said that he had tried to contact HMRC several times to discuss payment arrangements but was not called back. He had been visited by bailiffs and threatened with bankruptcy.

In upholding his appeal against the penalties, the FTT noted that he had been struck by a series of traumatic and unforeseeable life events which had impacted on his mental health. The fact that he had set aside funds to cover his tax bills indicated that he was a responsible taxpayer.

Prior to losing his job, he reasonably believed that he would be able to replenish the tax reserve and his decision to use it to fund his mother’s care was understandable. There was a lot on his plate; he was anxious to do the right thing and any taxpayer in his position would probably have done the same thing. He was now in a position to discharge all his tax liabilities and, overall, the FTT found that he had a reasonable excuse for late payment.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Challenge to Will's Validity Rejected by High Court

12th April, 2024 By

The best way to ensure your assets will be distributed as you wish is to have your will professionally drafted by a qualified solicitor. In a recent case, a challenge to the validity of an elderly man's will was dismissed by the High Court. The man had previously made a will in 2011, leaving most of his estate equally to his three children. In 2018, by which time one of his sons had predeceased him, he made a further will, leaving the residue of his estate to his other son...

Defiance of Family Court Orders Will Always End Badly

10th April, 2024 By

Custodial sentences very rarely come into play in the family courts. Where there have been repeated breaches of court orders, however, judges may have little choice but to clamp down. This was illustrated in the High Court during committal proceedings that stemmed from a child custody dispute. The background to the case involved contested proceedings between the father and mother of a young child. These concluded with a court order establishing that the child – a daughter – would live with the mother. Three months later the daughter travelled with...

Claim for SDLT Relief on Annex Unsuccessful

8th April, 2024 By

When buying a property consisting of more than one residence, it may be possible to claim multiple dwellings relief (MDR) against Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT). However, there are certain conditions that must be met for an MDR claim to succeed, as a recent case illustrates. A property was purchased for £1.8 million. Prior to the purchase, the buyer had agreed with the seller that he would be allowed to carry out works to construct a self-contained annex at the property. The buyer's SDLT return included a claim for MDR...

Divorce – Alleged Bigamy Raised in Financial Remedies Dispute

5th April, 2024 By

The issue of bigamy and its potential impact on a person's ability to seek financial remedies in a divorce came under the legal spotlight recently. A husband made an application to strike out his wife's financial remedies claim on the basis that she had committed bigamy and deceived him into a marriage when she knew she was not free to marry. This deceit, he claimed, was so egregious that, as a matter of public policy, she should be debarred from pursuing any claim for financial remedies against him. The husband based...