fbpx

Tribunal Comes to Aid of Dutiful Son Penalised for Late Payment of Tax

21st August 2020 By

Prioritising prompt payment of your tax bills can be tough, particularly when there are other compelling and unforeseen demands on your limited resources. In a case on point, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) came to the aid of a man who dipped into his tax reserve to pay for his elderly mother’s care after she suffered a stroke.

After his mother fell ill, the man had to move to be closer to her. She had insufficient income to pay all of her nursing home fees so, with no support from his siblings, he stepped in to top them up. At around the same time, he lost his job as a consultant and subsequently had to take lower-paid work as a delivery driver. His daughter was facing a criminal investigation and that, combined with other family difficulties, had plunged him into depression. In order to pay for his mother’s care, he resorted to money that he had sensibly set aside to pay tax.

After his payment of more than £8,000 in tax and National Insurance Contributions was delayed, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) levied late payment penalties totalling 15 per cent of the tax due. He said that he had tried to contact HMRC several times to discuss payment arrangements but was not called back. He had been visited by bailiffs and threatened with bankruptcy.

In upholding his appeal against the penalties, the FTT noted that he had been struck by a series of traumatic and unforeseeable life events which had impacted on his mental health. The fact that he had set aside funds to cover his tax bills indicated that he was a responsible taxpayer.

Prior to losing his job, he reasonably believed that he would be able to replenish the tax reserve and his decision to use it to fund his mother’s care was understandable. There was a lot on his plate; he was anxious to do the right thing and any taxpayer in his position would probably have done the same thing. He was now in a position to discharge all his tax liabilities and, overall, the FTT found that he had a reasonable excuse for late payment.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...