Transfer of Pension Fund Does Not Escape IHT Charge

4th February 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

Inheritance Tax (IHT) is not only payable on the value of the estate of a deceased person, but can also be levied on ‘transfers of value’ from the deceased’s estate in the seven (exceptionally 14) years prior to their death.

But what counts as a transfer of value? A recent court case led to a conclusion that many might see as unfair and rather counter-intuitive.

It involved a woman who had been divorced from her husband since 2000. As part of the financial settlement on divorce, a ‘pension split’ was agreed whereby she took a share of her ex-husband’s pension. This was put into an ‘old style’ scheme called a ‘Section 32 buyout’. Six years later, she transferred that scheme into a ‘new style’ personal pension plan. These have the advantage that the pension fund can be transferred to family members directly if the pension owner dies, so there is not normally any IHT to pay. Under the Section 32 provisions, the lump sum on death would have been paid to her estate and would have been subject to IHT.

Two months after making the transfer she died, having nominated her two sons to receive the value of her pension fund. Her executor claimed that the transfer took the fund outside of IHT…the argument essentially being that the fund was hers before the transfer and hers afterwards, so there was no transfer of value to anyone else.

HM Revenue and Customs were successful in defeating that argument in the Court of Appeal on the ground that the transfer was intended to confer a gratuitous benefit to her sons out of assets in her control.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Informal Agreement Leads Family to Court of Appeal

22nd August, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

Disputes within families are very common indeed and one of the issues the courts see over and over again is where there is a family 'understanding' that ends in a disagreement. In a recent case, the result of one such dispute is that an 82-year-old woman will be forced to sell the home she has lived in for decades. Many such cases involve farming businesses. These traditionally pass down from generation to generation, and often one child will work on the farm for many years with the others moving away. It...

Tax Investigations – Judge Authorises Disclosure of Credit Card Bills

19th August, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

To what extent are the tax authorities entitled to delve into what would otherwise be your private financial information? The High Court tackled that issue in authorising disclosure of a wealthy businessman's credit card statements to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) as part of a cross-border investigation into his tax affairs. The Swedish businessman claimed not to be subject to Swedish tax on the basis that he had emigrated to Switzerland. The Swedish tax authorities considered that he remained ordinarily resident in Sweden and requested HMRC's assistance in investigating the...

Court Returns Two-Year-Old to Land of Birth When Parents' Marriage Collapses

16th August, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

For a UK court to have jurisdiction over a family law case, it is necessary to show that at least one party to it has habitual residence in the UK. In a recent case, an Israeli woman divorcing her Israeli husband sought a declaration that their two-year-old daughter was habitually resident in the UK so that the UK Family Court could deal with the hearings regarding the child's welfare. The Court refused the application and accepted that the child should be removed to Israel in accordance with the father's wishes....

Be Careful What You Post

13th August, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

Although the final result was not financial ruin for the defendant, a recent case illustrates how unwise it is to vent one's spleen on social media. It involved a firm of solicitors that had been involved in the sale of 'off plan' properties in Cyprus. This led an unhappy purchaser to make a post on Facebook and in a webinar that made allegations of mis-selling against the firm and others related to it. The result was a claim for damages for defamation. In hearing the claim, the High Court had firstly...