Transfer of Pension Fund Does Not Escape IHT Charge

4th February 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

Inheritance Tax (IHT) is not only payable on the value of the estate of a deceased person, but can also be levied on ‘transfers of value’ from the deceased’s estate in the seven (exceptionally 14) years prior to their death.

But what counts as a transfer of value? A recent court case led to a conclusion that many might see as unfair and rather counter-intuitive.

It involved a woman who had been divorced from her husband since 2000. As part of the financial settlement on divorce, a ‘pension split’ was agreed whereby she took a share of her ex-husband’s pension. This was put into an ‘old style’ scheme called a ‘Section 32 buyout’. Six years later, she transferred that scheme into a ‘new style’ personal pension plan. These have the advantage that the pension fund can be transferred to family members directly if the pension owner dies, so there is not normally any IHT to pay. Under the Section 32 provisions, the lump sum on death would have been paid to her estate and would have been subject to IHT.

Two months after making the transfer she died, having nominated her two sons to receive the value of her pension fund. Her executor claimed that the transfer took the fund outside of IHT…the argument essentially being that the fund was hers before the transfer and hers afterwards, so there was no transfer of value to anyone else.

HM Revenue and Customs were successful in defeating that argument in the Court of Appeal on the ground that the transfer was intended to confer a gratuitous benefit to her sons out of assets in her control.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Court Visit Required to Give Clarity to Will

18th February, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

Many wills contain clauses which alter the distribution of assets in the event of changing circumstances, such as the death of one of the beneficiaries under the will before the person making it. When drafting such clauses, it is essential that they are absolutely clear to prevent confusion, as a recent case shows. It involved the will of a woman who died in 1973, leaving her estate in trust for her son for his lifetime and then to his children if he had any. If he did not, the estate was...

Fraud Victim Sacrificed His Home by Delay in Seeking Legal Advice

15th February, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

If you have a legitimate legal complaint, any delay in consulting a solicitor is highly likely to benefit the wrongdoer. A man whose home was taken from him by fraud, but who delayed over 20 years before taking legal action, found that out to his cost. The man had been dispossessed of his home in 1989 by a fraudster who made use of forged documents in successfully having the property registered in his name. The fraudster subsequently transferred the house to his son, who was aware of the fraud. The...

UK Fairness Test Mitigates Italian Pre-Nuptial Agreement

12th February, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

The law relating to the division of family assets on divorce varies widely across the world and the UK is generally regarded as one of the fairer jurisdictions for such financial arrangements in that the assets tend to be divided more equally than in many other countries. Accordingly, where a family with an international lifestyle breaks up and there is a reasonably strong connection to the UK, it is often chosen as the jurisdiction of preference for divorce proceedings by a spouse who might be disadvantaged if the proceedings are...

What is the Tax Status of Compensation for Financial Product Mis-Selling?

7th February, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

Is compensation paid to individuals whose businesses have failed due to mis-selling of financial products subject to Income Tax? In a decision that will disappoint many victims of bank wrongdoing, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) has answered that question in the affirmative. The case concerned seven brothers whose property letting business had been mis-sold interest rate hedging products (IRHPs). The business subsequently failed, allegedly due to the high interest rates imposed by the IRHPs. After they lodged complaints, the relevant bank paid them basic compensation totalling almost £360,000. HM Revenue and...