Timeshare Credit Agreements Worth £47 Million May Be Unenforceable

4th December 2018 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

Lending money to the public is, for obvious reasons, a heavily regulated activity and, as a case concerning timeshare properties showed, any involvement by those who are not authorised to carry out such activity can render credit agreements entirely unenforceable.

A bank had entered into more than 1,400 regulated credit agreements with members of the public by which they borrowed money to pay for the timeshare properties. About £47 million was payable under those agreements. It later emerged, however, that they had been brokered by a company that was not authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 to perform that role.

As a result, the bank faced the prospect of the agreements being unenforceable against the borrowers, who would also be entitled to recover any money or property they had transferred to the bank pursuant to them. The bank, however, said that it had not intentionally contravened the requirement to only engage with authorised third parties when making the agreements and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) ordered that the agreements should be retrospectively validated under Section 28A of the Act.

In challenging that decision before the Upper Tribunal (UT), lawyers representing 45 of the borrowers argued that they had suffered detriment as vulnerable consumers. It was said, amongst other things, that the agreements had not been adequately explained to them and that they had been put under pressure to sign them. False representations were alleged to have been made by the unauthorised broker and borrowers claimed that they had been given insufficient time to consider before the agreements were executed.

In the light of those arguments, the bank and the FCA both conceded that the decision to grant validation orders should be reconsidered. The UT found that evidence of consumer detriment arising from the agreements was relevant and should be fully taken into account by the FCA.

Source: Concious

Latest News

International Dimension Makes Child Travel Risky

24th April, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

The welfare of children is always top of the list of priorities of the Family Court when making arrangements following the break-up of a family. This can be especially difficult where the parents are from different countries, as shown by a recent case in which the Court considered the welfare of a child of a Mexican mother and an English father. When the child, aged seven, had expressed a wish to return to live in Mexico, the CAFCASS official appointed as the child's guardian recommended that this did not occur....

Is IHT Simplification On the Way?

18th April, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

More than 550,000 people die annually in the UK and half of those deaths require the completion of Inheritance Tax (IHT) forms, which are not straightforward and can be a daunting burden at a difficult time for families. However, only 5 per cent of estates actually end up paying IHT. When there is an IHT liability, the average sum payable is about 20 per cent (the IHT rate is 40 per cent) of estates between £1 million and £9 million, but then falls to an effective rate of half that...

Fake Will Admission May Lead to Criminal Charges

15th April, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

When your spouse's lack of attention to making a will causes issues, faking one is definitely not a good idea, as a Kent woman found out recently. Her husband died in 2013 leaving various properties in Spain and a flat in England, but no will. The woman admitted to faking her late husband's will, which she had used to obtain a grant of probate and to sell the Spanish properties. She bought a property in London with some of the proceeds and moved into it with her stepson and his wife. When...

High Court Decision Underlines the Finality of Divorce Arbitration Awards

12th April, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

Divorcing couples can sometimes achieve savings of both time and money by opting for arbitration, rather than court proceedings, as a means of resolving any financial disputes. However, as a guideline High Court case underlined, arbitration has its potential downsides and it is vital to remember that arbitrators' decisions are generally treated as final. Faced with the prospect of having to wait several months for a court date following the breakdown of their ten-year marriage, a middle-aged couple chose to submit their differences to an arbitrator. He decided that the...