Timeshare Credit Agreements Worth £47 Million May Be Unenforceable

4th December 2018 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

Lending money to the public is, for obvious reasons, a heavily regulated activity and, as a case concerning timeshare properties showed, any involvement by those who are not authorised to carry out such activity can render credit agreements entirely unenforceable.

A bank had entered into more than 1,400 regulated credit agreements with members of the public by which they borrowed money to pay for the timeshare properties. About £47 million was payable under those agreements. It later emerged, however, that they had been brokered by a company that was not authorised under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 to perform that role.

As a result, the bank faced the prospect of the agreements being unenforceable against the borrowers, who would also be entitled to recover any money or property they had transferred to the bank pursuant to them. The bank, however, said that it had not intentionally contravened the requirement to only engage with authorised third parties when making the agreements and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) ordered that the agreements should be retrospectively validated under Section 28A of the Act.

In challenging that decision before the Upper Tribunal (UT), lawyers representing 45 of the borrowers argued that they had suffered detriment as vulnerable consumers. It was said, amongst other things, that the agreements had not been adequately explained to them and that they had been put under pressure to sign them. False representations were alleged to have been made by the unauthorised broker and borrowers claimed that they had been given insufficient time to consider before the agreements were executed.

In the light of those arguments, the bank and the FCA both conceded that the decision to grant validation orders should be reconsidered. The UT found that evidence of consumer detriment arising from the agreements was relevant and should be fully taken into account by the FCA.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Leaving Your ISA to Your Family

13th December, 2018 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

Individual Savings Accounts (ISAs) have many advantages over normal savings accounts – chiefly that the investment income earned on them is tax free and gains within them are not subject to Capital Gains Tax. They are, not surprisingly, widely regarded as a staple tool in the financial planning toolbox. A UK resident can invest up to £20,000 each tax year in an ISA. However, there are disadvantages, one of which is that ISAs are always held by one individual and cannot be held jointly. This means that on death, an...

Your Home May Be Your Castle But Planning Rules Must Be Obeyed

12th December, 2018 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

The widespread belief that 'an Englishman's home is his castle' can all too easily lead the unwary into breaching planning rules. That was certainly so in a case concerning a householder who found herself in serious trouble after splitting her home into two self-contained residential units without planning permission. The woman had built a side-extension to her semi-detached urban home and was authorised to use it as a guest bedroom with an en suite bathroom and a play area. Kitchen facilities were, however, at some stage added and the extension,...

Capital and Income Losses Mean Different Things for Tax

10th December, 2018 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

When an investment is made in a capital asset that subsequently becomes valueless, the loss can normally be used to reduce future liabilities to Capital Gains Tax when a capital asset is sold at a profit. There are also rules which permit trading expenses and losses to be set against other income for Income Tax (IT) purposes, reducing the IT liability. When a businessman lent his father's skip-hire business money that the latter was unable to repay, he claimed IT deductions for the resultant bad debts, which totalled more than £147,000. The...

Child Contact Disputes Can Be Defused by Mediation – But Take Advice Soon

7th December, 2018 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

If parents engaged in child contact disputes take up entrenched positions, it is very nearly always the child that suffers most. Such disputes can often be defused by taking legal advice at an early stage in order to promote dialogue and an amicable resolution. In one case where this did not happen, a father ended up being banned from having any direct contact with his nine-year-old daughter. Since the parents' separation, the girl had lived exclusively with her mother, who had married another man. During five years of relentless litigation,...