fbpx

This is Why You Shouldn't Put Off Making a Will Until Advanced Old Age

1st June 2021 By

You are never too old to make a will, but failing to consult a solicitor before you reach advanced old age can be a positive invitation to dispute amongst your loved ones after you are gone. That was certainly so in the case of a woman who was 94 when she signed her last will in a shaky hand.

The wealthy woman’s niece considered that their relationship was a close one. After receiving a legacy of £100 in her aunt’s will, she challenged the document’s validity. She argued that her aunt lacked the mental capacity required to make a valid will, that her cousin had brought undue influence to bear upon her and that her signature on the will was in any event a forgery.

Ruling on the matter, the High Court noted that, although old age is often associated with dementia, the woman’s advanced years alone did not prove that she was unable to make a valid will. Although she was diagnosed with dementia nine months after making the will, the medical evidence indicated that she was capable of rational decision-making when she signed it.

The cousin provided support to the woman in her final years, visiting her frequently, and there was no scintilla of evidence that he had neglected her or subjected her to undue influence. The Court was satisfied that the will was the product of the woman’s own free will and accurately reflected her wishes.

Expert evidence had revealed a number of features of the woman’s signature on the will which indicated that it might be a forgery. However, the Court noted that many elderly people have shaky signatures and old age was the likely explanation for the woman’s declining fluency with a pen. The niece had failed to show that the signature was probably a forgery. The validity of the will was upheld.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Retired Businessman's Final Will Ruled Invalid

2nd May, 2024 By

Having your will drawn up professionally by a qualified solicitor is always a sensible precaution, especially in later life. In a recent case, the High Court ruled that a retired businessman lacked testamentary capacity when he made a will less than three and a half years before he died at the age of 87. The man and his first wife were married for nearly 40 years and had four children. After her death he married again. In October 2015 he made a new will, revoking in most respects a will...

Company Owner's Negligible Value Claim Unsuccessful

29th April, 2024 By

When an asset falls in value to the point that it is almost worthless, it may be possible to make a negligible value claim under Section 24 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992. The asset will then be treated as if it had been sold and immediately acquired again, so that the loss can be set off against other income. For a claim to succeed, however, the asset must have become of negligible value during the time the claimant owned it. On 30 September 2017, a woman who...

Court Sanctions Leg Amputation for Man Lacking Mental Capacity

24th April, 2024 By

The courts are often called upon to sanction treatment for patients whose ability to make decisions for themselves is impaired. In a recent case on point, the Court of Protection had to decide whether it was in the best interests of a man with mental health issues to have his right leg amputated above the knee. The man, aged 60, was taken to hospital by his niece. He was found to have an ulcerated leg. He had a history of paranoid schizophrenia, and believed that the sores on his leg...

High Court Grants Parental Order Despite Previous Adoption

18th April, 2024 By

In law, adopted children are regarded as having been born to their adoptive parents. The Family Division of the High Court recently considered whether that fact precluded a parental order being granted under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (HFEA) in respect of a child born via surrogacy. A couple who lived in the USA had entered into a surrogacy arrangement with another woman. An adoption order naming the couple as the child's parents had been made by a US court and was automatically recognised under UK law. However,...