fbpx

This is Why You Shouldn't Put Off Making a Will Until Advanced Old Age

1st June 2021 By

You are never too old to make a will, but failing to consult a solicitor before you reach advanced old age can be a positive invitation to dispute amongst your loved ones after you are gone. That was certainly so in the case of a woman who was 94 when she signed her last will in a shaky hand.

The wealthy woman’s niece considered that their relationship was a close one. After receiving a legacy of £100 in her aunt’s will, she challenged the document’s validity. She argued that her aunt lacked the mental capacity required to make a valid will, that her cousin had brought undue influence to bear upon her and that her signature on the will was in any event a forgery.

Ruling on the matter, the High Court noted that, although old age is often associated with dementia, the woman’s advanced years alone did not prove that she was unable to make a valid will. Although she was diagnosed with dementia nine months after making the will, the medical evidence indicated that she was capable of rational decision-making when she signed it.

The cousin provided support to the woman in her final years, visiting her frequently, and there was no scintilla of evidence that he had neglected her or subjected her to undue influence. The Court was satisfied that the will was the product of the woman’s own free will and accurately reflected her wishes.

Expert evidence had revealed a number of features of the woman’s signature on the will which indicated that it might be a forgery. However, the Court noted that many elderly people have shaky signatures and old age was the likely explanation for the woman’s declining fluency with a pen. The niece had failed to show that the signature was probably a forgery. The validity of the will was upheld.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...