Thinking of Dispensing With Legal Advice on a House Sale? Think Again!

1st March 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

Home-made contracts, particularly for the sale of land, are a singularly bad idea and can lead to costs that dwarf the modest sums needed to secure proper professional advice. Exactly that happened in one case in which a house purchase contract was so inexpertly drafted as to cast grave doubt on its validity.

The owner of the property negotiated with his neighbours with a view to selling it to a company owned by one of them. A contract was drafted by one of the neighbours, who was not a lawyer, and was signed following an informal meeting. On the face of it, the contract provided that the company would pay a deposit of £3,000 before purchasing the house for £145,000. The contract stated that the sale would be finalised as soon as the legal and banking formalities were completed.

After the seller sought to withdraw from the deal, the company registered a unilateral notice at the Land Registry in order to protect its interest in the property. The dispute was in due course referred to the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) after the seller applied to cancel that notice.

In ruling on the matter, the FTT noted that the contract did not define exactly what legal and banking formalities needed to be satisfied before the sale would be completed. It also did not attempt to impose any time limit for completion or any obligation on the company to exercise due diligence in pursuing completion within a reasonable time. In those circumstances, the FTT directed cancellation of the notice on the basis that the contract was so uncertain in its effect as to be void.

In upholding the company’s challenge to that ruling, the Upper Tribunal noted that text message and email contact between the seller and his neighbours made it plain that there had been an intention to enter into a legally binding agreement. It was, in the circumstances, legally and practically possible to imply terms into the contract that gave sensible effect to that intention.

The absence of a definition of legal and banking formalities was not fatal in that the phrase could be read as referring to steps required to put in place finance for the purchase and to undertake the normal conveyancing process. Given the background and the wording of the contract, it was also possible to imply into it an obligation to complete those formalities and to achieve completion as soon as reasonably practicable. The validity of the contract having been upheld, the company had a subsisting interest in the property and the unilateral notice would not be discharged.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Disinheriting Relatives Can Be a Recipe for Discord

21st March, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

You may have good reasons for writing close relatives out of your will but, as any lawyer will tell you, the consequence of doing so can be family discord after you are gone. That was certainly so in one case concerning a father who disinherited his daughter by his first marriage. The man's will left the whole of his estate to his second wife and appointed her and one of his nieces as his executors. In a statement attached to the will he explained that he was leaving nothing to...

Tribunal Paves the Way for Suburban Garden Development

18th March, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

Restrictions on land use appear in the title deeds of many properties – but the law permits their deletion or modification if they become obsolete over time or stand in the way of reasonable development. Exactly that happened in one case in which the Upper Tribunal (UT) opened the way for construction of three new homes in a large suburban garden despite neighbours' objections. The garden once formed a large field on the outskirts of a major city. Part of it was subject to a restrictive covenant, dated 1928, which...

Commercial Surrogacies Abroad Are Not Illegal – Court of Appeal Ruling

15th March, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

Although commercial surrogacy businesses have long been banned in the UK, the Court of Appeal recently ruled that a clinical negligence victim would not be breaking the law were she to enter into such an arrangement in California, where a more liberal surrogacy regime prevails. The woman is unable to have children after she developed cervical cancer and had to undergo radical surgery. The NHS trust that was responsible for her treatment was ordered by a judge to pay her almost £600,000 in compensation after it admitted that four opportunities...

Social Media – Be Careful!

12th March, 2019 By Alireza Nurbakhsh

The legal dispute between Elon Musk and Vernon Unsworth, the man who helped to rescue boys trapped in a cave in Thailand, may have dropped out of the press over the last few weeks, but a recent case shows the lack of accuracy of Mr Musk's assertion that Twitter was just the forum for a 'schoolyard spat' that would not be taken seriously by users who expect to read 'opinion, not facts'. The case involved a tweet made by the agent of a former chairman of UKIP in the run...