fbpx

Shareholders Relieved of Income Tax Liability on Dividends that Went Unpaid

7th February 2023 By

Shareholders are obviously liable to pay Income Tax on their dividends, but what if a declared dividend is not – and, in reality, never will be – paid? A tax tribunal pondered that issue in a case concerning an otherwise successful property management company that was saddled with crushing debt servicing costs.

The company was trading well and making good operating profits. Its interest costs in respect of bank loans were, however, so debilitating as to place its business at risk. It was anxious to attract new external equity investors and its sole director took the view that a record of strong dividend declarations would assist in that task.

The company gave a binding undertaking to the bank that it would not make dividend payments to its two shareholders above certain limits. However, with the knowledge of the bank, it formally declared dividends that were well above those limits. The majority of those dividends were never paid, and the relevant funds were instead allocated to inaccessible shareholder accounts with the intention that they would in due course be written back into subsequent company accounts.

HM Revenue and Customs took the view that the shareholders were liable to Income Tax on the declared dividends, as opposed to the much smaller sums that they had actually received. On that basis, back tax demands and late payment penalties, totalling in excess of £60,000, were raised against them.

In upholding their appeal against those demands, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) noted that the facts of the case were most unusual. It was clear that the shareholders had no immediate right to enforce payment of those parts of the declared dividends that exceeded the agreed limits and that any such payment was deferred until further notice or until mutually agreed.

Had the shareholders been paid dividends beyond the agreed limits, the bank would have been within its rights to suspend all further borrowing and to immediately call in all the company’s indebtedness. In the worst-case scenario, that would have led to a forced sale and foreclosure of the company’s property portfolio.

The FTT concluded that the dividends which were declared, but retained as unpaid and inaccessible, did not give rise to an enforceable right to receive them as income in the relevant tax years or, in the end, at all. The tax demands were overturned and the penalties thereby fell away.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...