fbpx

Saving a Few Pounds on a Home-Made Will May Come at a Frightful Cost

1st August 2022 By

There will always be some people who believe that making your own will represents a sensible economy. However, as a High Court ruling strikingly showed, saving the modest expense of having your will professionally drafted may come at a frightful emotional and financial cost to your loved ones after you are gone.

The case concerned a teacher whose marriage broke down after he fell prey to severe mental illness. Prior to his divorce, he made a will leaving his estate to his two young daughters. Following his sudden death, the daughters launched proceedings with a view to having that will admitted to probate.

Their claim was, however, vigorously contested by his partner at the time of his death. She asserted that he had signed a home-made will in the year before he died by which he revoked the earlier will and left the lion’s share of his estate to her and nothing at all to his daughters. The Court considered the formal validity or otherwise of the home-made will at a preliminary hearing.

Although the original of the home-made will had been lost, the Court was satisfied that its contents were accurately reflected by a draft document that was found on a computer following his death. It found on the evidence that the will had been properly executed and witnessed in accordance with the Wills Act 1837. He had not destroyed the will prior to his death with the intention of revoking it.

In ruling on the matter, the Court noted that it had been necessary for the man’s ex-wife and partner to relive the sad circumstances of his death and illness in court. The inheritance dispute had contributed to a complete breakdown in relations between them. The Court expressed the hope that further issues in the case might be resolved without the need for further distressing litigation.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...