Roles Split When Stress Makes Attorney Unreliable

8th September 2016 By Arman Khosravi

Appointing an attorney under a Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA) is normally a sensible precaution. The procedure allows one’s financial affairs (and, if required, matters relating to health and welfare) to be entrusted to others if you are unable to manage them yourself.

The procedure is that, at the appropriate time, the person named registers the LPA at the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG). The attorney then carries out the role under the supervision of the OPG, which, in normal circumstances, uses a very ‘light touch’.

The choice of attorney is clearly one which should be made with great care. Normally, family members, friends and/or a person’s solicitors are chosen to act as attorneys.

A recent case shows what can be done if an attorney becomes unsuitable after commencing to act.

It involved a man who appointed his wife and two children to be his attorneys for his property and financial affairs under an LPA. He appointed his daughter alone to be his attorney for his health and welfare. His daughter’s own daughter died aged four and her marriage broke down. The man’s wife also died.

Following those events, the daughter’s behaviour became difficult and her brother found it increasingly hard to deal with her. She absented herself for a long period from acting as attorney and there were fears that she was suffering from mental health issues herself. The brother wished to remove his sister from her position as attorney. As their father was not mentally capable of changing his LPA, the matter had to be resolved in court.

By the time the question of her suitability was brought to the Court of Protection (CoP), communications between her and her brother were being conducted through solicitors.

The CoP Visitor concluded that the daughter’s ‘worst’ behaviour had been limited to the period during which she was under the most stress. The CoP ruled that she should continue to act as her father’s health and welfare attorney as she had been specifically selected for that role, but should be removed as attorney for his property and financial affairs.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Challenge to Will's Validity Rejected by High Court

12th April, 2024 By

The best way to ensure your assets will be distributed as you wish is to have your will professionally drafted by a qualified solicitor. In a recent case, a challenge to the validity of an elderly man's will was dismissed by the High Court. The man had previously made a will in 2011, leaving most of his estate equally to his three children. In 2018, by which time one of his sons had predeceased him, he made a further will, leaving the residue of his estate to his other son...

Defiance of Family Court Orders Will Always End Badly

10th April, 2024 By

Custodial sentences very rarely come into play in the family courts. Where there have been repeated breaches of court orders, however, judges may have little choice but to clamp down. This was illustrated in the High Court during committal proceedings that stemmed from a child custody dispute. The background to the case involved contested proceedings between the father and mother of a young child. These concluded with a court order establishing that the child – a daughter – would live with the mother. Three months later the daughter travelled with...

Claim for SDLT Relief on Annex Unsuccessful

8th April, 2024 By

When buying a property consisting of more than one residence, it may be possible to claim multiple dwellings relief (MDR) against Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT). However, there are certain conditions that must be met for an MDR claim to succeed, as a recent case illustrates. A property was purchased for £1.8 million. Prior to the purchase, the buyer had agreed with the seller that he would be allowed to carry out works to construct a self-contained annex at the property. The buyer's SDLT return included a claim for MDR...

Divorce – Alleged Bigamy Raised in Financial Remedies Dispute

5th April, 2024 By

The issue of bigamy and its potential impact on a person's ability to seek financial remedies in a divorce came under the legal spotlight recently. A husband made an application to strike out his wife's financial remedies claim on the basis that she had committed bigamy and deceived him into a marriage when she knew she was not free to marry. This deceit, he claimed, was so egregious that, as a matter of public policy, she should be debarred from pursuing any claim for financial remedies against him. The husband based...