fbpx

Roles Split When Stress Makes Attorney Unreliable

8th September 2016 By Arman Khosravi

Appointing an attorney under a Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA) is normally a sensible precaution. The procedure allows one’s financial affairs (and, if required, matters relating to health and welfare) to be entrusted to others if you are unable to manage them yourself.

The procedure is that, at the appropriate time, the person named registers the LPA at the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG). The attorney then carries out the role under the supervision of the OPG, which, in normal circumstances, uses a very ‘light touch’.

The choice of attorney is clearly one which should be made with great care. Normally, family members, friends and/or a person’s solicitors are chosen to act as attorneys.

A recent case shows what can be done if an attorney becomes unsuitable after commencing to act.

It involved a man who appointed his wife and two children to be his attorneys for his property and financial affairs under an LPA. He appointed his daughter alone to be his attorney for his health and welfare. His daughter’s own daughter died aged four and her marriage broke down. The man’s wife also died.

Following those events, the daughter’s behaviour became difficult and her brother found it increasingly hard to deal with her. She absented herself for a long period from acting as attorney and there were fears that she was suffering from mental health issues herself. The brother wished to remove his sister from her position as attorney. As their father was not mentally capable of changing his LPA, the matter had to be resolved in court.

By the time the question of her suitability was brought to the Court of Protection (CoP), communications between her and her brother were being conducted through solicitors.

The CoP Visitor concluded that the daughter’s ‘worst’ behaviour had been limited to the period during which she was under the most stress. The CoP ruled that she should continue to act as her father’s health and welfare attorney as she had been specifically selected for that role, but should be removed as attorney for his property and financial affairs.

Source: Concious

Latest News

High Court Grants Parental Order Despite Previous Adoption

18th April, 2024 By

In law, adopted children are regarded as having been born to their adoptive parents. The Family Division of the High Court recently considered whether that fact precluded a parental order being granted under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (HFEA) in respect of a child born via surrogacy. A couple who lived in the USA had entered into a surrogacy arrangement with another woman. An adoption order naming the couple as the child's parents had been made by a US court and was automatically recognised under UK law. However,...

Flat Owner Not Liable for Pre-existing Structural Issues

16th April, 2024 By

When building owners carry out works on their property, are they liable for damage to adjoining properties that results from pre-existing structural issues? The Court of Appeal recently provided welcome clarification on that question. The owner of a ground-floor flat wished to extend it by building out into his garden. He served notices on owners of adjoining properties, as required by the Party Wall etc. Act 1996. The works caused the rear wall of two adjoining properties to drop by about 2 mm, which led to internal walls and floor...

Challenge to Will's Validity Rejected by High Court

12th April, 2024 By

The best way to ensure your assets will be distributed as you wish is to have your will professionally drafted by a qualified solicitor. In a recent case, a challenge to the validity of an elderly man's will was dismissed by the High Court. The man had previously made a will in 2011, leaving most of his estate equally to his three children. In 2018, by which time one of his sons had predeceased him, he made a further will, leaving the residue of his estate to his other son...

Defiance of Family Court Orders Will Always End Badly

10th April, 2024 By

Custodial sentences very rarely come into play in the family courts. Where there have been repeated breaches of court orders, however, judges may have little choice but to clamp down. This was illustrated in the High Court during committal proceedings that stemmed from a child custody dispute. The background to the case involved contested proceedings between the father and mother of a young child. These concluded with a court order establishing that the child – a daughter – would live with the mother. Three months later the daughter travelled with...