fbpx

Regulated tenant protected from meteoric rent increase where landlord keen to remove him

10th December 2020 By Arman Khosravi

Senior partner and statutory tenancies expert Russell Conway protects vulnerable regulated tenant from a 400% rent increase – a common tactic used by landlords to rid themselves of protected tenants.

Regulated tenancies

The client in question had a regulated tenancy under the Rent Act 1977, which entitled him to the following protections:

  • Regulated tenants pay a ‘fair rent’ which is often substantially lower than market value;
  • Regulated tenants can only be evicted by court order, and a legal reason for eviction must be proved (such as rent arrears).

Due to the one succession rule, the number of regulated tenancies in the UK is dwindling; there are less than 75,000 remaining. Regulated tenants often live in areas with high property values, paying rents that are substantially below the market value. This can make them targets for landlords and developers who may wish to evict rent act tenants to maximise profit on a property, or to vacate a building to develop it.

Background to the case

Such was the case in this situation. The client had resided happily in his flat since the 1960s, until his building was purchased by a company who were keen to undertake extensive works on the building.

The initial communications from the landlord were friendly. The landlord suggested the client may be happier staying in a hotel for the duration of the building work. They also offered to rehouse the client in a better flat in a building nearby.

However, the elderly client was in poor health and wished to stay in his home, as was his right. At this point, the landlord adopted a less amicable approach; they applied to the Valuation Office Agency (VOA) for a new fair rent to be registered.

What registering a new fair rent means

Registering a new fair rent is the process by which landlords of regulated tenancies can increase the rent on their property. Unlike a standard tenancy, landlords with regulated tenancies are restricted in their ability to change the value of rent. They can only increase rents by applying to the VOA for a new fair rent to be registered, and they can only do this once every two years.

A landlord can suggest what they believe the rent should be, and both parties can present evidence as to why the rent should or should not be increased. This evidence is then considered by a rent officer, who will often inspect the property in person before making a decision. Although applications often result in rent being increased, there have been cases where applications have backfired on landlords and rent officers have lowered the rent instead.

Suggested rent increase

In this situation, the landlord suggested a rent increase of 400%. This would have put the rent for the client’s flat on par with many high-spec modern flats in the area available on the open market. These open market properties suffered none of the defaults of the client’s property, which had not been well-maintained by the previous landlord.

By this time, the landlord’s planned building works were also underway, meaning the flat was beset by dust and noise, which would further reduce its market value. Russell Conway made representations to this effect on the client’s behalf.

Outcome

Following Mr Conway’s representations, the VOA registered a fair rent at a fraction of the increase which had been suggested by the landlord. This will ensure that the client is able to afford his rent payments whilst negotiations are ongoing in relation to the client’s future in the building.

‘The rent that we have achieved here is extremely good’ says Russell Conway. ‘As a result, the client will continue to be able to afford to live in his home of 50 years, which is a great result.’

If you would like help with a regulated tenancy issue, contact us today.

Latest News

Tenants Can Purchase Freehold When Landlord Cannot Be Found

11th June, 2024 By

The Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 gives qualifying leaseholders the right to join together to buy the freehold of their properties – a process known as collective enfranchisement. A recent case demonstrated that this right can be exercised even when the landlord cannot be found. The leaseholders of two flats in a terraced house wished to purchase it from the landlord, but were unable to ascertain his whereabouts and therefore could not serve notice on him under Section 13 of the Act. They therefore applied for an...

Court Refuses to Set Aside Divorce Order Applied for by Mistake

6th June, 2024 By

While the courts have a range of powers to set aside orders, they will only exercise them in limited circumstances. In a somewhat surprising case that has attracted much comment, the High Court declined to set aside a final order of divorce that had been applied for by mistake. A couple separated in January 2023, after more than 21 years of marriage. In October that year, while financial remedy proceedings were still ongoing, the wife's legal representatives inadvertently applied for a final order of divorce in respect of her instead...

Waiting Time for Grants of Probate Falls

3rd June, 2024 By

Following concerns last year about delays in processing probate applications, recent figures from HM Courts and Tribunals Service show that waiting times for grants of probate are continuing to improve. The average time from submission of a probate application to probate being granted fell to 11.3 weeks in March 2024, a decrease from 13.7 weeks in February and 13.8 weeks in January. This is the lowest figure since March 2023, when the average was 10.8 weeks. The longest waiting time since then was in November, at 15.8 weeks: that month,...

Late Appeal Against Tax Penalties Rejected

31st May, 2024 By

It is incumbent on taxpayers to make sure they fully comply with their obligations to file returns and pay any tax due. The point was illustrated by a recent case in which a taxpayer whose return had not been received by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) failed to persuade the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) that he should be permitted to appeal against the resulting penalties. On the evening of 31 January 2014, the man had completed his 2012/13 Income Tax return on HMRC's website. Shortly afterwards he went to Cyprus, and...