Psychiatrist Approves Marriage for Alzheimer's Patient

4th May 2018 By Arman Khosravi

Remarriages are a common source of disagreement and acrimony among family members and dementia is an increasingly prevalent issue, so it is unsurprising that when both were present, the result was a legal dispute in which the Court of Protection had to decide whether a man living with dementia could marry his long-term partner, with whom he cohabited.

The long-divorced man has lived with his partner for more than 20 years. His will already passes to her a considerable legacy, the right to live in his house for two years after his death and two thirds of his pension. The rest of his sizeable estate will pass to his daughters if his current will remains in force.

Marriage revokes a will, however, so were he to marry and not make a new will, on his death his entire estate would be distributed according to the rules of intestacy. The effect of that would be that his daughters would inherit less than under his existing will.

When the man announced his intention to marry his partner, his daughters sought an injunction to prevent the marriage from taking place, arguing that he lacks the mental capacity to marry because he has Alzheimer’s disease. The case was referred to the Court, which arranged for him to be assessed by a consultant psychiatrist.

Following the psychiatrist’s conclusion that the man fully understood the implications of his decision to marry, including the financial impact the marriage would have on his daughters, the Court agreed that the marriage could take place.

It is not clear whether the man’s dementia is so advanced that he would be considered incapable of making a valid new will.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...