Property Investment – Professional Supervision is Vital to Guard Against Fraud

24th February 2023 By

Fraud is a very real risk faced by investors in property developments and that is why detailed professional supervision of projects is so essential. The point was powerfully made by a case in which a family fell victim to dishonesty and lost millions on the ill-fated purchase and redevelopment of a luxury flat.

Following the flat’s purchase for £7.75 million, the project was to be administered by a man who would receive 5 per cent of profits generated on the property’s resale. In the event, there were no such profits and members of the family, who had substantially bankrolled the project via single-purpose corporate vehicles (SPVs), lost the entirety of their £2.5 million investment.

The offender, amongst other things, made fraudulent cash calls on investors, paying their funds into his personal accounts. Evidence emerged that he had spent their money on his personal rent, private school fees and a smart car. The project eventually fell apart when the flat’s freeholder obtained an injunction, requiring discontinuation of the works that had been carried out without permission. Mortgage payments were not met, and the denouement came when the flat was sold at auction for £5.5 million.

After the SPVs launched a private prosecution, the offender was convicted by a jury of a number of offences under the Fraud Act 2006 and the Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981. He was sentenced to a total of seven years’ imprisonment and was disqualified from acting as a company director for 10 years.

In rejecting his appeal against the sentence, the Court of Appeal found that he had been granted due credit for his mental health issues and other mitigation. Given his personal use of investors’ funds, there could be no suggestion that his offending was merely an attempt to keep the development show on the road. His challenge to the convictions was also dismissed.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Challenge to Will's Validity Rejected by High Court

12th April, 2024 By

The best way to ensure your assets will be distributed as you wish is to have your will professionally drafted by a qualified solicitor. In a recent case, a challenge to the validity of an elderly man's will was dismissed by the High Court. The man had previously made a will in 2011, leaving most of his estate equally to his three children. In 2018, by which time one of his sons had predeceased him, he made a further will, leaving the residue of his estate to his other son...

Defiance of Family Court Orders Will Always End Badly

10th April, 2024 By

Custodial sentences very rarely come into play in the family courts. Where there have been repeated breaches of court orders, however, judges may have little choice but to clamp down. This was illustrated in the High Court during committal proceedings that stemmed from a child custody dispute. The background to the case involved contested proceedings between the father and mother of a young child. These concluded with a court order establishing that the child – a daughter – would live with the mother. Three months later the daughter travelled with...

Claim for SDLT Relief on Annex Unsuccessful

8th April, 2024 By

When buying a property consisting of more than one residence, it may be possible to claim multiple dwellings relief (MDR) against Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT). However, there are certain conditions that must be met for an MDR claim to succeed, as a recent case illustrates. A property was purchased for £1.8 million. Prior to the purchase, the buyer had agreed with the seller that he would be allowed to carry out works to construct a self-contained annex at the property. The buyer's SDLT return included a claim for MDR...

Divorce – Alleged Bigamy Raised in Financial Remedies Dispute

5th April, 2024 By

The issue of bigamy and its potential impact on a person's ability to seek financial remedies in a divorce came under the legal spotlight recently. A husband made an application to strike out his wife's financial remedies claim on the basis that she had committed bigamy and deceived him into a marriage when she knew she was not free to marry. This deceit, he claimed, was so egregious that, as a matter of public policy, she should be debarred from pursuing any claim for financial remedies against him. The husband based...