Promoted to Partner in an LLP? Do You Understand the Tax Implications?

30th September 2021 By

Stepping up from the ranks to become a full partner in a limited liability partnership (LLP) involves a fundamental change in status from employment to self-employment. The tax consequences of that shift came under analysis in an important Upper Tribunal (UT) decision.

The case concerned a clothing retailer which operated as an LLP and paid bonuses to its employees under a long-term incentive plan (LTIP) by reference to profits made over a period of time. After five employees were promoted to become full partners in the LLP, they received bonus payments under the LTIP.

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) took the view that those bonuses were earnings derived from employment and were thus subject to Class 1 primary and secondary National Insurance Contributions (NICs). The LLP considered that they represented profit distributions and fell to be taxed as self-employed earnings. The amount of NICs in issue was in the order of £1 million.

The First-tier Tribunal ruled in favour of HMRC, but the LLP appealed. It pointed out that the status of being a partner in an LLP is in general an absolute bar to receiving employment income from the LLP. The five received the bonuses in their capacity as partners, and not that of employees, in that their entitlement to payments under the LTIP only crystallised after they became partners.

Dismissing the appeal, however, the UT found that the five received their bonuses in their capacity as former employees of the LLP. Their contractual right to payments under the LTIP had been acquired when they were still employees and was not affected by the fact that they had become partners by the time the payments were made.

The bonuses were not paid solely by virtue of the five being partners in the LLP but by virtue of the fact that they had complied with all the conditions of the LTIP, a scheme that was only open to employees. The fact that their bonus entitlements did not crystallise prior to them becoming partners had no impact on their pre-existing contractual rights.

The UT acknowledged that Section 4(4) of the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000 precludes a member of an LLP from also being an employee of the partnership at the same time. However, a conclusion that the bonuses paid to the five were derived from their employment did not involve any finding that they were to be regarded as continuing to be employees. When the bonus payments were made, the five had two different relationships with the LLP, as partners and as former employees with subsisting contractual rights.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...