fbpx

Planning Law – Take Advice Before You Act

23rd April 2018 By Arman Khosravi

The planning system is very far from straightforward and sensible landowners seek legal advice before tackling it. The point was underlined by one case in which a farmer ended up with a part-built barn and at risk of enforcement action if he completed the development.

The farmer argued that the barn was reasonably necessary for his agricultural unit and proposed using it for storing potatoes and as a maternity unit for his 45 ewes during the winter months. He began construction work after applying to the local authority for prior approval for the development on the basis that it was automatically permitted by the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (the GPDO).

In challenging the decision by way of judicial review, a neighbouring homeowner argued that the barn did not fall within the ambit of the GPDO because it was less than 400 metres from his and other homes, including a listed cottage, and was to be used for accommodating livestock. In quashing the council’s decision, the High Court accepted that it had exceeded its powers by granting prior approval when the barn’s status under the GPDO was in doubt.

The Court noted that the farmer had been within his rights to start building the barn after the council failed to reach a decision on his application for prior approval within 28 days. If he goes on to complete the development, however, he will be at risk of the council taking action to enforce its removal.

It remains open to him to seek planning consent for the development. Alternatively – on the assumption that his agricultural unit measures five hectares or more – he could still take advantage of the GPDO by abandoning his plans to use the barn for accommodating livestock and by moving it so that it is more than 400 metres away from his neighbour’s home and other dwellings.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...