fbpx

Planning Application Restricted to Preserve View

31st August 2018 By Arman Khosravi

On our densely populated island, there is a pressing need for available land to be put to sensible use and, where restrictive covenants lurking in title deeds prevent that happening, they can be modified. In a case on point, a man’s desire to provide a larger home for his growing family prevailed over his neighbours’ objections.

The case concerned a modest bungalow which sat on a large plot of semi-rural land in the Green Belt. Its owner, who has a wife and three small children, had obtained planning permission to knock it down and replace it with a five-bedroom house. His neighbours were, however, concerned that the project would, amongst other things, impinge on their unspoilt views of the surrounding countryside.

In resisting the proposals, the neighbours pointed to two restrictive covenants that forbade extension or alteration of the bungalow, or construction of further buildings in its grounds, without their written consent. After such consent was withheld, the owner applied to the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) for the covenants to be modified so that the development could proceed.

The FTT accepted that construction of the new house and a garage to serve it would be a reasonable use of the land and would not disturb the neighbours’ enjoyment of their property to any significant extent. The adjoining gardens were well screened from each other by trees and shrubs and the development would make no real difference to the neighbours. Whilst it did not doubt the sincerity of the neighbours’ concerns, the FTT found that they were without real substance.

The same, however, did not apply to plans for a new summerhouse – effectively an outsized gym or recreation space – that the owner also planned to construct. That would not be so well screened from the neighbours’ land and would have an adverse impact on their views and their sense of space and relative seclusion. In the circumstances, the FTT modified the covenants so as to enable construction of the house and garage, but not the summerhouse.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Challenge to Will's Validity Rejected by High Court

12th April, 2024 By

The best way to ensure your assets will be distributed as you wish is to have your will professionally drafted by a qualified solicitor. In a recent case, a challenge to the validity of an elderly man's will was dismissed by the High Court. The man had previously made a will in 2011, leaving most of his estate equally to his three children. In 2018, by which time one of his sons had predeceased him, he made a further will, leaving the residue of his estate to his other son...

Defiance of Family Court Orders Will Always End Badly

10th April, 2024 By

Custodial sentences very rarely come into play in the family courts. Where there have been repeated breaches of court orders, however, judges may have little choice but to clamp down. This was illustrated in the High Court during committal proceedings that stemmed from a child custody dispute. The background to the case involved contested proceedings between the father and mother of a young child. These concluded with a court order establishing that the child – a daughter – would live with the mother. Three months later the daughter travelled with...

Claim for SDLT Relief on Annex Unsuccessful

8th April, 2024 By

When buying a property consisting of more than one residence, it may be possible to claim multiple dwellings relief (MDR) against Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT). However, there are certain conditions that must be met for an MDR claim to succeed, as a recent case illustrates. A property was purchased for £1.8 million. Prior to the purchase, the buyer had agreed with the seller that he would be allowed to carry out works to construct a self-contained annex at the property. The buyer's SDLT return included a claim for MDR...

Divorce – Alleged Bigamy Raised in Financial Remedies Dispute

5th April, 2024 By

The issue of bigamy and its potential impact on a person's ability to seek financial remedies in a divorce came under the legal spotlight recently. A husband made an application to strike out his wife's financial remedies claim on the basis that she had committed bigamy and deceived him into a marriage when she knew she was not free to marry. This deceit, he claimed, was so egregious that, as a matter of public policy, she should be debarred from pursuing any claim for financial remedies against him. The husband based...