fbpx

Plagued by Noise Nuisance? You Don't Have to Just Grin and Bear It

4th November 2022 By

Sporting and other community facilities are obviously desirable but, as a guideline High Court ruling showed, there are effective legal steps you can take if they become a magnet for anti-social behaviour that amounts to a statutory nuisance.

Three householders who said that they were plagued by noise emanating from a nearby multi-games area and skate park sought an abatement order against the facility’s owner and occupier, the local parish council. Their application under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 was, however, rejected by a judge.

In doing so, he drew a sharp distinction between noise generated as a result of the intended recreational use of the facility and noise arising from anti-social activities, including the playing of loud music, abusive shouting and the use of the facility at night, after its official closing time.

Noting that a statutory nuisance can give rise to criminal liability and a fine, he ruled that the parish council should not be held responsible for anti-social behaviour over which it had no control and which was properly a matter to be addressed under the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014.

He went on to find that the householders had been rendered hypersensitive by the anti-social elements of what was going on at the facility and that noise arising from its intended use did not amount to a statutory nuisance.

Upholding the householders’ appeal against the judge’s ruling, the Court found that there was no statutory foundation for the distinction he made. He should have considered the impact on the householders’ health of all noise emanating from the facility regardless of whether it resulted from intended use or anti-social behaviour.

Having drawn a wrong distinction, the judge also fell into error when considering the issue of hypersensitivity. The correct question that he should have asked himself was whether a normal, reasonably resilient person could be expected to put up with all the noise coming from the facility.

The Court noted that, where a statutory nuisance is found to exist, judges are under a statutory obligation to issue an abatement order. The making of such orders may, however, be postponed to enable consideration of what steps need to be taken to abate a nuisance. The Court heard further argument as to what remedy should be granted to the householders.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Tenants Can Purchase Freehold When Landlord Cannot Be Found

11th June, 2024 By

The Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 gives qualifying leaseholders the right to join together to buy the freehold of their properties – a process known as collective enfranchisement. A recent case demonstrated that this right can be exercised even when the landlord cannot be found. The leaseholders of two flats in a terraced house wished to purchase it from the landlord, but were unable to ascertain his whereabouts and therefore could not serve notice on him under Section 13 of the Act. They therefore applied for an...

Court Refuses to Set Aside Divorce Order Applied for by Mistake

6th June, 2024 By

While the courts have a range of powers to set aside orders, they will only exercise them in limited circumstances. In a somewhat surprising case that has attracted much comment, the High Court declined to set aside a final order of divorce that had been applied for by mistake. A couple separated in January 2023, after more than 21 years of marriage. In October that year, while financial remedy proceedings were still ongoing, the wife's legal representatives inadvertently applied for a final order of divorce in respect of her instead...

Waiting Time for Grants of Probate Falls

3rd June, 2024 By

Following concerns last year about delays in processing probate applications, recent figures from HM Courts and Tribunals Service show that waiting times for grants of probate are continuing to improve. The average time from submission of a probate application to probate being granted fell to 11.3 weeks in March 2024, a decrease from 13.7 weeks in February and 13.8 weeks in January. This is the lowest figure since March 2023, when the average was 10.8 weeks. The longest waiting time since then was in November, at 15.8 weeks: that month,...

Late Appeal Against Tax Penalties Rejected

31st May, 2024 By

It is incumbent on taxpayers to make sure they fully comply with their obligations to file returns and pay any tax due. The point was illustrated by a recent case in which a taxpayer whose return had not been received by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) failed to persuade the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) that he should be permitted to appeal against the resulting penalties. On the evening of 31 January 2014, the man had completed his 2012/13 Income Tax return on HMRC's website. Shortly afterwards he went to Cyprus, and...