fbpx

Pension Scheme That Failed to Consider Wife's Claim Called to Account

9th September 2019 By Arman Khosravi

It is usual for occupational pension schemes to allow the spouse or partner of a scheme member to receive a reduced pension in the event that the member predeceases them. Normally, the appropriate beneficiary is set out in the scheme rules. With defined contribution schemes, such as Self-Invested Personal Pensions, the owner of the pension fund can choose to whom their pension pot is left by lodging a statement of choice with the pension scheme trustees. This latter arrangement can make pension scheme holdings useful tools in Inheritance Tax (IHT) planning as the pension passed on does not form part of a person’s estate for IHT purposes and no tax will be payable if the scheme owner dies before the age of 75.

It is important that pension scheme trustees consider their responsibilities in respect of dependants’ pensions carefully. In a recent case, the wife of a deceased pension scheme member complained to the Pensions Ombudsman that she had been deprived of her rightful pension when the scheme trustees decided to pay the dependant’s pension to his current partner. Although the woman no longer lived with him, she was still legally married to him.

No attempt had been made to establish whether either of the two women involved was financially dependent on the deceased scheme member or whether he was married.

The Pensions Ombudsman ordered the pension scheme trustees to reconsider their decision and to pay £500 in compensation to the man’s wife.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Court Sanctions Leg Amputation for Man Lacking Mental Capacity

24th April, 2024 By

The courts are often called upon to sanction treatment for patients whose ability to make decisions for themselves is impaired. In a recent case on point, the Court of Protection had to decide whether it was in the best interests of a man with mental health issues to have his right leg amputated above the knee. The man, aged 60, was taken to hospital by his niece. He was found to have an ulcerated leg. He had a history of paranoid schizophrenia, and believed that the sores on his leg...

High Court Grants Parental Order Despite Previous Adoption

18th April, 2024 By

In law, adopted children are regarded as having been born to their adoptive parents. The Family Division of the High Court recently considered whether that fact precluded a parental order being granted under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (HFEA) in respect of a child born via surrogacy. A couple who lived in the USA had entered into a surrogacy arrangement with another woman. An adoption order naming the couple as the child's parents had been made by a US court and was automatically recognised under UK law. However,...

Flat Owner Not Liable for Pre-existing Structural Issues

16th April, 2024 By

When building owners carry out works on their property, are they liable for damage to adjoining properties that results from pre-existing structural issues? The Court of Appeal recently provided welcome clarification on that question. The owner of a ground-floor flat wished to extend it by building out into his garden. He served notices on owners of adjoining properties, as required by the Party Wall etc. Act 1996. The works caused the rear wall of two adjoining properties to drop by about 2 mm, which led to internal walls and floor...

Challenge to Will's Validity Rejected by High Court

12th April, 2024 By

The best way to ensure your assets will be distributed as you wish is to have your will professionally drafted by a qualified solicitor. In a recent case, a challenge to the validity of an elderly man's will was dismissed by the High Court. The man had previously made a will in 2011, leaving most of his estate equally to his three children. In 2018, by which time one of his sons had predeceased him, he made a further will, leaving the residue of his estate to his other son...