Pension Pot Holders Fail to Take Advice

5th October 2018 By Arman Khosravi

If you are approaching pension age, unless you are one of the increasingly few with a salary-related pension scheme, you would be wise to take professional advice before you take any irrevocable action. The decisions taken at certain points in managing your pension will affect the whole of your retired life and may also impact on how much of your estate passes to your family.

Under the current pension system, those who have ‘money purchase’ type schemes will typically either take an annuity or manage their own pension fund using a Self-Invested Personal Pension (SIPP).

An annuity involves swapping your fund for an income for life (or a guaranteed period) for yourself and, if you wish, your spouse. Although there are options as to length of guarantee and indexation, once the annuity is purchased it is a done deal and cannot normally be amended. Annuities can also be higher where a health condition exists which is likely to shorten one’s life. The annuity rates quoted by the companies offering them vary quite a lot and a company that was highly competitive a few months ago may no longer be.

SIPPs are very flexible in comparison with annuities. They allow far more options as regards taking income or leaving the fund to grow, and include the popular ‘drawdown’ option, which has thus far allowed 1.5 million pension owners to access their pension pots in part. However, a SIPP will carry charges from the provider and is also likely to carry higher risk, as well as the potential for higher reward. Under a SIPP, the responsibility for managing the investments in the pension fund is passed to the pension holder.

A recent report by the Financial Conduct Authority has shown that nearly 60 per cent of people with pensions with drawdown had little idea where they were invested and 33 per cent had their entire pension in cash – which in most SIPPs means a zero rate of interest at best. The report concludes that pensioners are missing out on considerable potential income because of the amount of cash being held.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Challenge to Will's Validity Rejected by High Court

12th April, 2024 By

The best way to ensure your assets will be distributed as you wish is to have your will professionally drafted by a qualified solicitor. In a recent case, a challenge to the validity of an elderly man's will was dismissed by the High Court. The man had previously made a will in 2011, leaving most of his estate equally to his three children. In 2018, by which time one of his sons had predeceased him, he made a further will, leaving the residue of his estate to his other son...

Defiance of Family Court Orders Will Always End Badly

10th April, 2024 By

Custodial sentences very rarely come into play in the family courts. Where there have been repeated breaches of court orders, however, judges may have little choice but to clamp down. This was illustrated in the High Court during committal proceedings that stemmed from a child custody dispute. The background to the case involved contested proceedings between the father and mother of a young child. These concluded with a court order establishing that the child – a daughter – would live with the mother. Three months later the daughter travelled with...

Claim for SDLT Relief on Annex Unsuccessful

8th April, 2024 By

When buying a property consisting of more than one residence, it may be possible to claim multiple dwellings relief (MDR) against Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT). However, there are certain conditions that must be met for an MDR claim to succeed, as a recent case illustrates. A property was purchased for £1.8 million. Prior to the purchase, the buyer had agreed with the seller that he would be allowed to carry out works to construct a self-contained annex at the property. The buyer's SDLT return included a claim for MDR...

Divorce – Alleged Bigamy Raised in Financial Remedies Dispute

5th April, 2024 By

The issue of bigamy and its potential impact on a person's ability to seek financial remedies in a divorce came under the legal spotlight recently. A husband made an application to strike out his wife's financial remedies claim on the basis that she had committed bigamy and deceived him into a marriage when she knew she was not free to marry. This deceit, he claimed, was so egregious that, as a matter of public policy, she should be debarred from pursuing any claim for financial remedies against him. The husband based...