fbpx

Pension Pot Holders Fail to Take Advice

5th October 2018 By Arman Khosravi

If you are approaching pension age, unless you are one of the increasingly few with a salary-related pension scheme, you would be wise to take professional advice before you take any irrevocable action. The decisions taken at certain points in managing your pension will affect the whole of your retired life and may also impact on how much of your estate passes to your family.

Under the current pension system, those who have ‘money purchase’ type schemes will typically either take an annuity or manage their own pension fund using a Self-Invested Personal Pension (SIPP).

An annuity involves swapping your fund for an income for life (or a guaranteed period) for yourself and, if you wish, your spouse. Although there are options as to length of guarantee and indexation, once the annuity is purchased it is a done deal and cannot normally be amended. Annuities can also be higher where a health condition exists which is likely to shorten one’s life. The annuity rates quoted by the companies offering them vary quite a lot and a company that was highly competitive a few months ago may no longer be.

SIPPs are very flexible in comparison with annuities. They allow far more options as regards taking income or leaving the fund to grow, and include the popular ‘drawdown’ option, which has thus far allowed 1.5 million pension owners to access their pension pots in part. However, a SIPP will carry charges from the provider and is also likely to carry higher risk, as well as the potential for higher reward. Under a SIPP, the responsibility for managing the investments in the pension fund is passed to the pension holder.

A recent report by the Financial Conduct Authority has shown that nearly 60 per cent of people with pensions with drawdown had little idea where they were invested and 33 per cent had their entire pension in cash – which in most SIPPs means a zero rate of interest at best. The report concludes that pensioners are missing out on considerable potential income because of the amount of cash being held.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Tenants Can Purchase Freehold When Landlord Cannot Be Found

11th June, 2024 By

The Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 gives qualifying leaseholders the right to join together to buy the freehold of their properties – a process known as collective enfranchisement. A recent case demonstrated that this right can be exercised even when the landlord cannot be found. The leaseholders of two flats in a terraced house wished to purchase it from the landlord, but were unable to ascertain his whereabouts and therefore could not serve notice on him under Section 13 of the Act. They therefore applied for an...

Court Refuses to Set Aside Divorce Order Applied for by Mistake

6th June, 2024 By

While the courts have a range of powers to set aside orders, they will only exercise them in limited circumstances. In a somewhat surprising case that has attracted much comment, the High Court declined to set aside a final order of divorce that had been applied for by mistake. A couple separated in January 2023, after more than 21 years of marriage. In October that year, while financial remedy proceedings were still ongoing, the wife's legal representatives inadvertently applied for a final order of divorce in respect of her instead...

Waiting Time for Grants of Probate Falls

3rd June, 2024 By

Following concerns last year about delays in processing probate applications, recent figures from HM Courts and Tribunals Service show that waiting times for grants of probate are continuing to improve. The average time from submission of a probate application to probate being granted fell to 11.3 weeks in March 2024, a decrease from 13.7 weeks in February and 13.8 weeks in January. This is the lowest figure since March 2023, when the average was 10.8 weeks. The longest waiting time since then was in November, at 15.8 weeks: that month,...

Late Appeal Against Tax Penalties Rejected

31st May, 2024 By

It is incumbent on taxpayers to make sure they fully comply with their obligations to file returns and pay any tax due. The point was illustrated by a recent case in which a taxpayer whose return had not been received by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) failed to persuade the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) that he should be permitted to appeal against the resulting penalties. On the evening of 31 January 2014, the man had completed his 2012/13 Income Tax return on HMRC's website. Shortly afterwards he went to Cyprus, and...