fbpx

Pension Pot Holders Fail to Take Advice

5th October 2018 By Arman Khosravi

If you are approaching pension age, unless you are one of the increasingly few with a salary-related pension scheme, you would be wise to take professional advice before you take any irrevocable action. The decisions taken at certain points in managing your pension will affect the whole of your retired life and may also impact on how much of your estate passes to your family.

Under the current pension system, those who have ‘money purchase’ type schemes will typically either take an annuity or manage their own pension fund using a Self-Invested Personal Pension (SIPP).

An annuity involves swapping your fund for an income for life (or a guaranteed period) for yourself and, if you wish, your spouse. Although there are options as to length of guarantee and indexation, once the annuity is purchased it is a done deal and cannot normally be amended. Annuities can also be higher where a health condition exists which is likely to shorten one’s life. The annuity rates quoted by the companies offering them vary quite a lot and a company that was highly competitive a few months ago may no longer be.

SIPPs are very flexible in comparison with annuities. They allow far more options as regards taking income or leaving the fund to grow, and include the popular ‘drawdown’ option, which has thus far allowed 1.5 million pension owners to access their pension pots in part. However, a SIPP will carry charges from the provider and is also likely to carry higher risk, as well as the potential for higher reward. Under a SIPP, the responsibility for managing the investments in the pension fund is passed to the pension holder.

A recent report by the Financial Conduct Authority has shown that nearly 60 per cent of people with pensions with drawdown had little idea where they were invested and 33 per cent had their entire pension in cash – which in most SIPPs means a zero rate of interest at best. The report concludes that pensioners are missing out on considerable potential income because of the amount of cash being held.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Court Explores Alleged 'Grave Risk' in Child Abduction Case

28th March, 2024 By

Cross-jurisdictional disputes surrounding child custody can be complex but, in cutting through the complexities, the courts will always focus on the welfare of the children involved, as was evidenced in a High Court case centred on a child abduction. A father wrongfully removed his 5-year-old child from Lithuania during an agreed contact session and took him back to the UK. Prior to this abduction, a series of contested proceedings related to the child's custody had already taken place in the Lithuanian courts. The father had applied to have the child returned...

Tenant Succeeds in Reducing Service Charges

26th March, 2024 By

A case recently decided by the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) serves as a reminder to tenants to check the terms of their leases and to monitor the service charges they are asked to pay. The tenant of a ground-floor flat sought a determination of liability to pay service charges under Section 27A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, in respect of the 2017-2022 service charge years. He challenged various charges, on grounds that they was no evidence that they had been incurred or that they had not reasonably been incurred. Although...

Risk Passing on Exchange of Contracts

20th March, 2024 By Arman Khosravi

Risk Passing on Exchange of Contracts   Between Exchange and Completion (where the property is freehold):- It is generally the responsibility of the seller to take care of the property and to keep it insured against damage. The buyer also has a responsibility to insure the property from the exchange of contracts because of “Risk Passing”. There is no obligation on the seller to maintain buildings insurance once exchange has taken place.  It is therefore very important that buildings insurance for the property is in place before you proceed to exchange...

Court of Appeal Overturns Will Dispute Ruling

20th March, 2024 By

Unfortunately, will disputes can sometimes be drawn out long after the passing of the person who bequeathed their assets. This was so in a contentious probate battle which progressed to the Court of Appeal after a High Court judgment was challenged. The crux of the matter was a 2015 will made by a woman prior to her death at the age of 85. In that will, the woman bequeathed her home – her largest asset – to her only daughter. The daughter and the woman's three sons were to share...