Passenger Defeats International Airline in Battle Over Misspelt Name

26th March 2021 By

Individuals can feel almost powerless when faced with the might of large corporations but, with the right legal advice, that is very far from being so. In a case on point, a judge ruled that an international airline had no right to charge a passenger almost £1,000 for a fresh ticket merely because the original contained a spelling mistake.

Six days before he and his wife were due to fly to Canada, the passenger noticed that his wife’s name was misspelt on her ticket. After contacting the airline, he was informed that a new ticket would have to be issued at a price of £916. He said that he had no option but to pay that sum under protest, but subsequently launched proceedings against the airline with a view to recovering his money.

The airline alleged that it was the passenger who made the spelling mistake when he booked the flight. It argued that it was under no obligation to arrange transport for anyone who was not named in the booking. Having arranged the flight through another carrier, it said the sum charged reflected its own outlay.

Upholding the passenger’s claim, however, the judge found that he was under no contractual obligation to buy a new ticket. It was more likely than not that he had spelt his wife’s name correctly and that the error was not his. The airline had produced no evidence that it was necessary to purchase a new ticket from the other carrier or that it had in fact done so. The airline was ordered to refund the passenger for the price of the new ticket and an administrative charge it had levied. With court costs, his award came to £1,058.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Creating a Family Trust? Are You Sure It Reflects Your True Intentions?

20th April, 2021 By

Rather than giving money to your children directly, you may choose for a variety of good reasons to provide for them by way of a discretionary trust. Such a step is a serious matter, however, and as a High Court case underlined, it is extremely difficult to alter a trust deed after it has been formally executed. The case concerned a father who wished to make provision for his three children from an inheritance of about £450,000 that he had received from his mother. He signed a deed that varied...

Sensible Divorcees Put Personal Animosity Aside – Court of Appeal Ruling

15th April, 2021 By

Any good lawyer will tell you that it is far better for divorcing couples to agree how their assets should be divided, rather than fighting it out in court. A Court of Appeal case showed, however, that, where personal animosity persists, it is only too easy for the terms of such agreements to themselves become the subject of dispute. The case concerned a very wealthy couple who, following highly acrimonious divorce proceedings, resolved to settle their differences. They signed a consent order which it was hoped would lead to a...

COVID-19 – High Court Authorises Vaccination of Elderly Dementia Sufferer

12th April, 2021 By

Should vulnerable people who lack the mental capacity to make important decisions for themselves be vaccinated against COVID-19 even in the face of objections from their loved ones? The High Court confronted that uniquely difficult issue in the case of an 80-year-old care home resident who was suffering from dementia. The woman's son did not object to vaccination in principle but was deeply sceptical about the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines and the speed at which they had been authorised for use. In opposing her vaccination, he argued that her wishes...

In Dispute with Your Neighbour? A Lawyer Will Help to Restore Peace

9th April, 2021 By

Disputes between neighbours frequently inflict enormous emotional and financial harm on all involved. A High Court dispute concerning use of a shared driveway showed why any lawyer would advise sensible negotiation as a far better alternative to litigation. A couple's right of way over the driveway, by which they accessed their rural home, was restricted to passage on foot or by private motor vehicles. Their neighbour, with whom they shared the driveway, launched proceedings against them alleging that they were in long-standing breach of that restriction by permitting its use...