fbpx

Parents Who Simply Cannot Cope Don't Deserve Condemnation

8th January 2021 By

Through no fault of their own, some parents are simply incapable of providing the care and stability that all children need whilst growing up. As one case showed, however, the approach of family judges is not to condemn but to seek solutions that enable children to continue living in the bosom of their families.

The case concerned two children, aged four and five, whose mother suffered mental health difficulties, in part due to her own unhappy childhood. Unable to cope, she tended to smack and shout at them. They suffered bumps and bruises because she did not keep a proper eye on them. The state of the family home was very poor and the children were sometimes dirty and not dressed properly.

After social workers intervened, the mother sensibly recognised how bad things had become and accepted that she could not be the children’s primary carer. They went to live with their aunt and uncle, who provided them with a wonderful home. The local authority applied to the Family Court for special guardianship orders which would regularise that arrangement.

In ruling on the matter, the Court’s primary consideration was the children’s welfare. They were entitled to respect for their private and family lives and, although it was obvious that they could not return to live with their mother, their aunt and uncle had transformed their own lives in order to provide them with a stable home, within their natural family, where they were thriving.

Granting the orders sought, the Court noted that the couple had encouraged regular contact between the children and their mother, who undoubtedly loved them and was doing her best to conquer her difficulties. Close contact between them and their older sibling, who was living with another family member, had also been maintained.

The special guardianship orders meant that the children would, throughout their childhood, remain settled with the aunt and uncle, who would have overriding parental responsibility for them.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Tenants Can Purchase Freehold When Landlord Cannot Be Found

11th June, 2024 By

The Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 gives qualifying leaseholders the right to join together to buy the freehold of their properties – a process known as collective enfranchisement. A recent case demonstrated that this right can be exercised even when the landlord cannot be found. The leaseholders of two flats in a terraced house wished to purchase it from the landlord, but were unable to ascertain his whereabouts and therefore could not serve notice on him under Section 13 of the Act. They therefore applied for an...

Court Refuses to Set Aside Divorce Order Applied for by Mistake

6th June, 2024 By

While the courts have a range of powers to set aside orders, they will only exercise them in limited circumstances. In a somewhat surprising case that has attracted much comment, the High Court declined to set aside a final order of divorce that had been applied for by mistake. A couple separated in January 2023, after more than 21 years of marriage. In October that year, while financial remedy proceedings were still ongoing, the wife's legal representatives inadvertently applied for a final order of divorce in respect of her instead...

Waiting Time for Grants of Probate Falls

3rd June, 2024 By

Following concerns last year about delays in processing probate applications, recent figures from HM Courts and Tribunals Service show that waiting times for grants of probate are continuing to improve. The average time from submission of a probate application to probate being granted fell to 11.3 weeks in March 2024, a decrease from 13.7 weeks in February and 13.8 weeks in January. This is the lowest figure since March 2023, when the average was 10.8 weeks. The longest waiting time since then was in November, at 15.8 weeks: that month,...

Late Appeal Against Tax Penalties Rejected

31st May, 2024 By

It is incumbent on taxpayers to make sure they fully comply with their obligations to file returns and pay any tax due. The point was illustrated by a recent case in which a taxpayer whose return had not been received by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) failed to persuade the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) that he should be permitted to appeal against the resulting penalties. On the evening of 31 January 2014, the man had completed his 2012/13 Income Tax return on HMRC's website. Shortly afterwards he went to Cyprus, and...