Non-UK Residency – Tribunal Relieves Taxpayer of £3 Million Tax Demand

4th August 2022 By

Claims to non-UK residency for tax purposes are a political and fiscal hot potato and HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) are, to say the least, reluctant to accept them. In an exceptional case, however, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) backed a hard-pressed taxpayer and relieved her of a seven-figure tax demand.

The woman relocated from the UK to Ireland before receiving a dividend on shares of about £8 million. HMRC refused to accept that she was a non-UK resident during the relevant tax year and amended her self-assessment tax return so that it showed additional tax due in excess of £3 million.

She was aware that, in order to qualify for non-UK resident status, she was only permitted to be present in this country for 45 additional days during the tax year concerned. She had exceeded that allotment by a few days, but asserted that she had only done so in order to deal with an unforeseen family crisis.

In upholding her appeal, the FTT noted that she had strayed beyond the 45-day limit after travelling to the UK twice during the relevant period in order to provide care for her twin sister, who was suffering from alcoholism, and her two children. Although she was under no legal obligation to provide such care, the circumstances were exceptional and the FTT ruled that the excess days she spent in this country should therefore be disregarded.

The FTT rejected HMRC’s argument that the exceptional circumstances exemption contained in the Finance Act 2013 does not apply to taxpayers who come to the UK under a moral, rather than legal, obligation. It also found that the exemption does not apply exclusively to taxpayers who are already in the UK when overtaken by events that prevent them from leaving. In both respects, the FTT found that there was no justification for such a restrictive reading of the statutory language.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...