Non-Residents Beware – Ignorance of UK Tax Law is No Excuse

27th March 2018 By Arman Khosravi

About 900,000 UK citizens are long-term residents abroad, and it is no particular surprise that they may be less careful about managing their UK tax affairs than those who live in the UK. Many foreign residents retain UK properties, and when these are sold a Capital Gains Tax (CGT) return in respect of the sale must (since 6 April 2015) be filed with HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) within 30 days of the disposal. This applies even if no CGT liability results. Note that this is different from the normal reporting of capital gains, which are reported on the annual tax return, for which the deadline for filing is 31 January following the end of the tax year (the previous 5 April).

The penalties for failing to file the CGT return are £100 as soon as the return is late, then £10 per additional day for returns that are more than three months late. After a return is six months late, the penalty rises to 5 per cent of the tax due, and then 10 per cent of the tax due if it is more than 12 months late.

The changes were not terribly well publicised. Needless to say, many properties were sold by people living abroad who were completely unaware of their responsibilities. After considerable protests, most of the daily penalty notices were withdrawn.

When a long-term resident of Australia contested penalty charges levied on him, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) quashed them, agreeing that it was unfair to expect the man to keep a weather eye on changes to UK tax law when he was living abroad – but that was last September. In two more recent cases, the FTT has ruled in favour of HMRC and confirmed the penalties…ignorance of the applicable law being deemed not to be an excuse for not complying with it.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...