Missing Persons – Steps to Take

24th October 2019 By Arman Khosravi

Surprisingly, nearly 250,000 people go missing in the UK every year. Leaving aside the heartache and worry this causes, until recent changes in the law it also created an appalling position for family members trying to deal with the affairs of the person who had disappeared, as they had to be declared legally dead before any action could be taken – a procedure that took years.

Matters have been much simplified by the introduction of guardianship orders, which allow the finances and property of a missing person to be managed. They can be applied for at the High Court. They are available when a person is missing from home and:

  • is missing for at least 90 days;
  • is in prison abroad and cannot communicate;
  • has been taken hostage or kidnapped; or
  • you do not know where they are, or they cannot contact you to convey their decisions.

You can apply for the order if you are the missing person’s:

  • husband, wife or civil partner;
  • parent;
  • child;
  • brother or sister; or
  • guardian already and are renewing the order.

You can also apply if you can give the court evidence that you have a ‘sufficient interest’ in the person’s finances or property. These applications will be considered on the facts in each case, but would, for example, include the person’s long-term partner.

A guardianship order costs £528 if you apply through the Chancery Division of the High Court or £245 if you apply through the Family Division. A security bond may also be payable. The Court may allow this to be paid from the person’s funds.

When guardianship has been granted, a £200 set-up fee and an annual ‘supervision fee’ of £320 are payable.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Relationship Status Put Under Spotlight in Divorce Case

26th February, 2024 By

Divorce proceedings are rarely cut and dry, especially where the passage of time adds complexity to matters. This was certainly so in a recent case that required a Family Court judge to rule on the validity of a decree nisi. The case centred on the divorce proceedings of a couple in their fifties and focused on a decree nisi that had been pronounced in 2012, following an application by the husband. Now seeking to finalise the divorce with a decree absolute, the husband asserted that the decree nisi had been properly...

Will Execution – Remote Witnessing Legislation Expires

22nd February, 2024 By

A legal amendment that was made during the COVID-19 pandemic allowing the witnessing of wills to take place via videoconferencing has officially expired. As of 31 January 2024, the Wills Act 1837 (Electronic Communications) (Amendment) (Coronavirus) Order 2020 is no longer active. It was introduced in response to the pandemic, as a means of facilitating the valid execution of wills via remote witnessing. The Order applied to wills made between 31 January 2020 and 31 January 2022, but was later extended to 31 January 2024. Section 9 of the Wills Act...

Psychotherapy Condition Leads to Contact Order Appeal

20th February, 2024 By

Wherever possible, the courts will do what they can to support contact between parents and children but, in some instances, that contact comes with conditions attached. The nature of such conditions was the cause of contention in recent appeal proceedings brought by the father of two young boys. The man appealed against a High Court order that allowed for contact periods with his children, which would progress from supervised to unsupervised and increase in length but were dependent upon him engaging in psychotherapy. This condition had been imposed following a...

Beware of Builders Offering Cut-Price Work – Court of Appeal Cautionary Tale

16th February, 2024 By

Every householder should understand the dire risks involved in opening their doors to those promising to carry out cut-price building work. A Court of Appeal decision provided distressing examples of almost the worst that can happen. A householder approaching retirement age was taken in by a workman who knocked on his door, offering to paint the front of his home for £1,000. He was introduced to another man – the offender – whom the workman described as his business partner. The pair proceeded, over a period of months, to carry...