Man's 'Debilitating Fear' of Filing a Tax Return Not a Reasonable Excuse

5th September 2022 By

There is such a thing as a reasonable excuse for failing to file your self-assessment tax return. However, in an unusual case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) ruled that a businessman’s alleged debilitating fear of making a mistake in his return did not qualify as such.

The man’s tax affairs had in the past been the subject of a criminal investigation by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC). He had been interviewed under caution but, in the event, had not been prosecuted. He nevertheless took the view that HMRC had waged an aggressive campaign against him.

He said that his mental health had suffered to the extent that he moved abroad so that he would not have to deal with HMRC again. He also asserted that his upbringing in the Catholic part of Belfast during the Troubles had left him with an extreme distrust of the British state.

HMRC raised a £10,664 penalty against him after he failed to file a tax return for the year ended 5 April 2015. Challenging that bill before the FTT, he argued that he had a reasonable excuse for his failure in the form of a debilitating fear that even a slight mistake in preparing his return would expose him to further investigation and, potentially, prosecution.

Dismissing his appeal, the FTT noted that undergoing a criminal investigation would be a stressful experience for any taxpayer. It accepted that mental health difficulties may in some cases give rise to a reasonable excuse. However, it had considerable reservations about the reliability of the man’s testimony.

The FTT saw no evidence of bullying, intimidation or impropriety in HMRC’s dealings with him. His assertion that he was fearful that any mistake in his return might be seized upon by HMRC to launch a criminal prosecution was fanciful. There was no medical evidence that he was suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder or any other form of mental ill health. He was a professional man with extensive business experience and the forceful and assertive manner in which he gave his evidence did not indicate that he was a timid personality.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...