Making a Will? Have You Considered Your Loved Ones' Real Needs?

10th August 2020 By

For many parents, the objective of a will is to ensure even-handed treatment of loved ones, particularly children. However, as a High Court case strikingly showed, some may be more needy than others and that too should be taken into account.

The case concerned a married father of two who died in a domestic house fire. By his will, he left his entire estate – which was valued at £554,000 before deduction of Inheritance Tax – to his widow. She moved into a private care home after his death at a cost of more than £50,000 a year. Aged in her 80s, she had multiple health difficulties and was not capable of living independently.

The couple’s son, a successful businessman, was comfortably off. The same could not, however, be said for their daughter, who had a history of severe and debilitating mental illness and had, to their intense grief, been largely estranged from her parents for at least a decade. She had two primary-school-aged children and lived in a rented flat. She was dependent on benefits and her finances were precarious.

The daughter issued proceedings under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, seeking reasonable provision from her father’s estate. Amongst other things, she sought a substantial capital sum, in order to provide her with a regular income, and sufficient funds to enable her to purchase her own flat.

Ruling on the matter, the Court found that the daughter was in a position of real need and that her father’s will did not provide for her reasonably. However, given the fairly modest size of the estate, meeting all her wishes was simply unaffordable. Priority had to be given to the needs of the widow, who, given the scale of her care home fees, had her own money worries.

Striking a balance, the Court awarded the daughter £138,918 from the estate. That sum, whilst insufficient to allow her to buy her own home, would enable her to pay for the psychiatric therapy that she urgently required, amongst other things. It would also provide her with an income for about three years whilst that therapy continued.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...