fbpx

Making a Will? Appointing a Professional Executor Can Save Strife and Money

28th January 2021 By

The trouble with appointing loved ones as executors of your will is that they are likely to be grief-stricken and there can be no guarantee that they will get on. A High Court decision showed that appointing a professional to perform the task is often the best way to save money and preserve harmony.

The case concerned a businessman who sadly died at a young age. He had assets worth about £920,000, principally made up of three properties and his shares in a company he ran with his life partner. The partner and the deceased’s brother were appointed executors of the estate.

After the executors failed to see eye to eye, the brother launched proceedings on the basis that the partner had refused to participate in the process of obtaining a grant of probate. The partner denied that there had been any lack of cooperation on his part and eventually agreed that he and the brother should both step down as executors and be replaced by a legal professional.

The executors, however, both put forward candidates to fulfil that role and the Court was required to adjudicate between them. There was little between the candidates’ knowledge and experience and both were well qualified to perform the task. The Court, however, appointed the candidate preferred by the partner, principally on the basis that he would charge a lower hourly rate for his services in executing a will that contained no complicated or unusual provisions.

The Court expressed sympathy for the partner, who had suffered a devastating grief reaction to the businessman’s death. Although he had presented his case well and appropriately, he had used language in pre-trial correspondence which was at times intemperate. Due to such unreasonable conduct, he was ordered to pay the legal costs of the case on the punitive indemnity basis.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...