Make a Lasting Power of Attorney While You Still Have the Capacity to Do So

12th August 2022 By

Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) enable thousands of vulnerable people to have their financial and other affairs managed by others whom they trust. However, as a High Court case showed, it is vital to remember that they can only be granted by those who retain the mental capacity to make their own rational choices.

The case concerned a 60-year-old man who had a lifelong learning disability and a diagnosis of chronic schizophrenia. In 2009, he purported to grant an LPA in favour of his two brothers and his mother. Some years later, an issue arose as to whether he at the time had the mental capacity required to execute a valid LPA.

Ruling on the matter, the Court emphasised that there was no suggestion that there had been any fraud or other misconduct on the part of his attorneys or that he was unduly influenced into making the LPA. All concerned held him in great affection and had throughout sought to act in his best interests.

Shortly before his mother’s death, he moved into a care home where he continued to exhibit his love of the arts and his enjoyment of books and music. He could manage many of the activities of daily living independently. He had, however, suffered behavioural problems and was currently subject to deprivation of liberty restrictions which prevented him from leaving the home without supervision.

After considering expert and other evidence, the Court found that he was, in 2009, incapable of making a valid LPA due to an impairment in the functioning of his brain. Although it could be inferred that the nature and importance of the document were explained to him, it could not be inferred that he was able to understand, retain or weigh any advice or information he received.

Having declared the LPA invalid, the Court directed that his affairs should henceforth be managed by a court-appointed deputy or deputies. Their identity, whether lay or professional, would be determined following a further hearing.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Award That Requires Borrowing Made Into Court Order

17th May, 2024 By

Disagreements between separating couples all too often result in litigation that substantially reduces the assets available to them, as was illustrated by a case that recently reached the High Court. At issue was whether awards made by arbitrators in financial remedy proceedings can be made into court orders even if that would require one of the parties to borrow money. The couple had previously had a relationship lasting a few years before resuming their relationship in 2015. They had two children before separating again in 2019. Following their separation, the...

Inheritance Disputes – Costs Risks Can Be Reduced

15th May, 2024 By

Arguments about what someone promised before their death can lead to significant legal costs. However, if faced with a claim against the estate, there may be steps the beneficiaries or executors can take to reduce the risks, as a recent High Court case illustrated. A man had left a farmhouse and agricultural land in Cornwall to his wife, with whom he had also jointly owned a neighbouring area of land. After his death, one of the couple's daughters and her husband claimed that he had told them he wanted them...

Share Rounding Error Does Not Prevent CGT Relief

13th May, 2024 By

There are often very specific rules that must be complied with in order to claim tax reliefs, but if a small mistake arises, the courts may be able to provide assistance. In a recent case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) found that an investor was entitled to Entrepreneurs' Relief on the disposal of his shares in a company, despite owning one share fewer than he needed to qualify for it. The investor had agreed to purchase 5 per cent of the shares in the company for £500,000. He wished to own...

Wife Entitled to Maintenance Until Sale of Family Home

10th May, 2024 By

When divorcing couples disagree on how assets should be divided, the courts will seek to arrive at a fair outcome for both parties. In deciding how the proceeds of sale of a former couple's home should be apportioned, the Family Court agreed with the wife that she should receive maintenance payments until the sale took place. The couple had married in 2006. Following a brief separation, they had reconciled for two years before finally separating in 2022. The husband and wife both contended that they should be entitled to about...