fbpx

LPA Error Means Court Appearance

31st July 2019 By Arman Khosravi

It is normally essential when creating a legal document to get the procedures right, and failure to do so can cause unnecessary complications.

A recent case dealt with the problem of what happens if a person creates a document that contains an error but loses mental capacity to correct the mistake before the error is noticed.

In 2016, a woman had executed two lasting powers of attorney (LPAs). One was to deal with her health and welfare and the other her financial affairs. Her husband and two solicitors were appointed as attorneys under both.

The LPA covering her financial affairs was sent to the financial institutions she dealt with so that her attorneys could manage the accounts. Some time later, one of the financial institutions noticed that the woman’s signature on the LPA had been witnessed by one of the attorney solicitors, which technically invalidated the LPA.

As the woman had by now lost the mental capacity to create or approve an LPA, the attorney involved sought the approval of the Office of the Public Guardian for the LPA to remain in effect.

The regulations regarding the creation of LPAs are quite specific, stating that for an LPA to be given effect, a donee may not witness any signature required for the power apart from that of another donee. In other words, the attorney could not witness the woman’s signature, only that of another attorney.

The Court of Protection then considered whether the LPA could be rectified, but concluded that the woman’s mental incapacity rendered that impossible. Accordingly, the attorneys were invited to make an application to be appointed to act as ‘property and affairs deputies’ by the Court. This is essentially the same as acting as an attorney, but the work is carried out under the supervision of the Court. The practical effect is normally that it ends up being rather more expensive.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Tenants Can Purchase Freehold When Landlord Cannot Be Found

11th June, 2024 By

The Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 gives qualifying leaseholders the right to join together to buy the freehold of their properties – a process known as collective enfranchisement. A recent case demonstrated that this right can be exercised even when the landlord cannot be found. The leaseholders of two flats in a terraced house wished to purchase it from the landlord, but were unable to ascertain his whereabouts and therefore could not serve notice on him under Section 13 of the Act. They therefore applied for an...

Court Refuses to Set Aside Divorce Order Applied for by Mistake

6th June, 2024 By

While the courts have a range of powers to set aside orders, they will only exercise them in limited circumstances. In a somewhat surprising case that has attracted much comment, the High Court declined to set aside a final order of divorce that had been applied for by mistake. A couple separated in January 2023, after more than 21 years of marriage. In October that year, while financial remedy proceedings were still ongoing, the wife's legal representatives inadvertently applied for a final order of divorce in respect of her instead...

Waiting Time for Grants of Probate Falls

3rd June, 2024 By

Following concerns last year about delays in processing probate applications, recent figures from HM Courts and Tribunals Service show that waiting times for grants of probate are continuing to improve. The average time from submission of a probate application to probate being granted fell to 11.3 weeks in March 2024, a decrease from 13.7 weeks in February and 13.8 weeks in January. This is the lowest figure since March 2023, when the average was 10.8 weeks. The longest waiting time since then was in November, at 15.8 weeks: that month,...

Late Appeal Against Tax Penalties Rejected

31st May, 2024 By

It is incumbent on taxpayers to make sure they fully comply with their obligations to file returns and pay any tax due. The point was illustrated by a recent case in which a taxpayer whose return had not been received by HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) failed to persuade the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) that he should be permitted to appeal against the resulting penalties. On the evening of 31 January 2014, the man had completed his 2012/13 Income Tax return on HMRC's website. Shortly afterwards he went to Cyprus, and...