LPA Error Means Court Appearance

31st July 2019 By Arman Khosravi

It is normally essential when creating a legal document to get the procedures right, and failure to do so can cause unnecessary complications.

A recent case dealt with the problem of what happens if a person creates a document that contains an error but loses mental capacity to correct the mistake before the error is noticed.

In 2016, a woman had executed two lasting powers of attorney (LPAs). One was to deal with her health and welfare and the other her financial affairs. Her husband and two solicitors were appointed as attorneys under both.

The LPA covering her financial affairs was sent to the financial institutions she dealt with so that her attorneys could manage the accounts. Some time later, one of the financial institutions noticed that the woman’s signature on the LPA had been witnessed by one of the attorney solicitors, which technically invalidated the LPA.

As the woman had by now lost the mental capacity to create or approve an LPA, the attorney involved sought the approval of the Office of the Public Guardian for the LPA to remain in effect.

The regulations regarding the creation of LPAs are quite specific, stating that for an LPA to be given effect, a donee may not witness any signature required for the power apart from that of another donee. In other words, the attorney could not witness the woman’s signature, only that of another attorney.

The Court of Protection then considered whether the LPA could be rectified, but concluded that the woman’s mental incapacity rendered that impossible. Accordingly, the attorneys were invited to make an application to be appointed to act as ‘property and affairs deputies’ by the Court. This is essentially the same as acting as an attorney, but the work is carried out under the supervision of the Court. The practical effect is normally that it ends up being rather more expensive.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Challenge to Will's Validity Rejected by High Court

12th April, 2024 By

The best way to ensure your assets will be distributed as you wish is to have your will professionally drafted by a qualified solicitor. In a recent case, a challenge to the validity of an elderly man's will was dismissed by the High Court. The man had previously made a will in 2011, leaving most of his estate equally to his three children. In 2018, by which time one of his sons had predeceased him, he made a further will, leaving the residue of his estate to his other son...

Defiance of Family Court Orders Will Always End Badly

10th April, 2024 By

Custodial sentences very rarely come into play in the family courts. Where there have been repeated breaches of court orders, however, judges may have little choice but to clamp down. This was illustrated in the High Court during committal proceedings that stemmed from a child custody dispute. The background to the case involved contested proceedings between the father and mother of a young child. These concluded with a court order establishing that the child – a daughter – would live with the mother. Three months later the daughter travelled with...

Claim for SDLT Relief on Annex Unsuccessful

8th April, 2024 By

When buying a property consisting of more than one residence, it may be possible to claim multiple dwellings relief (MDR) against Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT). However, there are certain conditions that must be met for an MDR claim to succeed, as a recent case illustrates. A property was purchased for £1.8 million. Prior to the purchase, the buyer had agreed with the seller that he would be allowed to carry out works to construct a self-contained annex at the property. The buyer's SDLT return included a claim for MDR...

Divorce – Alleged Bigamy Raised in Financial Remedies Dispute

5th April, 2024 By

The issue of bigamy and its potential impact on a person's ability to seek financial remedies in a divorce came under the legal spotlight recently. A husband made an application to strike out his wife's financial remedies claim on the basis that she had committed bigamy and deceived him into a marriage when she knew she was not free to marry. This deceit, he claimed, was so egregious that, as a matter of public policy, she should be debarred from pursuing any claim for financial remedies against him. The husband based...