Letting Your Land Go to Rack and Ruin is an Invitation to Squatters

5th March 2020 By

Letting your land stand vacant, going to rack and ruin, inevitably carries the risk that a squatter will obtain title to it. A woman who inherited a small but strategic strip of land from her builder father came within an ace of suffering that fate.

The strip was deliberately retained by the woman’s father after his firm constructed a small housing estate in the 1970s. Following its transfer to her, the woman, who lived many miles away, took little or no interest in it. After it became overgrown by weeds, a resident of the estate incorporated the unfenced strip into her garden, laying turf and decorating it with shrubs and pots.

Claiming adverse possession rights over the strip, the resident applied to have legal title to it registered in her name under the Land Registration Act 2002. She claimed to have occupied the strip as of right, and without the registered owner’s permission, for more than 10 years. After the woman objected to her application, the matter was referred to the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) for resolution.

The FTT found that the resident and/or her husband had sought and obtained the consent of the woman’s father to tidy and tend the strip shortly after they moved onto the estate in 1975. The resident had thereafter taken factual possession and control of the strip. She had, however, failed to establish that she had the required intent to take exclusive possession of the strip throughout the 10-year period prior to her application.

She had never challenged anyone else’s use of the strip and, when a third party queried who owned it in 2018, she had referred him to the building firm once run by the woman’s father. She had never believed, whether reasonably or otherwise, that the strip belonged to her. The FTT directed the Chief Land Registrar to cancel the resident’s application to have the strip transferred into her name.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Challenge to Will's Validity Rejected by High Court

12th April, 2024 By

The best way to ensure your assets will be distributed as you wish is to have your will professionally drafted by a qualified solicitor. In a recent case, a challenge to the validity of an elderly man's will was dismissed by the High Court. The man had previously made a will in 2011, leaving most of his estate equally to his three children. In 2018, by which time one of his sons had predeceased him, he made a further will, leaving the residue of his estate to his other son...

Defiance of Family Court Orders Will Always End Badly

10th April, 2024 By

Custodial sentences very rarely come into play in the family courts. Where there have been repeated breaches of court orders, however, judges may have little choice but to clamp down. This was illustrated in the High Court during committal proceedings that stemmed from a child custody dispute. The background to the case involved contested proceedings between the father and mother of a young child. These concluded with a court order establishing that the child – a daughter – would live with the mother. Three months later the daughter travelled with...

Claim for SDLT Relief on Annex Unsuccessful

8th April, 2024 By

When buying a property consisting of more than one residence, it may be possible to claim multiple dwellings relief (MDR) against Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT). However, there are certain conditions that must be met for an MDR claim to succeed, as a recent case illustrates. A property was purchased for £1.8 million. Prior to the purchase, the buyer had agreed with the seller that he would be allowed to carry out works to construct a self-contained annex at the property. The buyer's SDLT return included a claim for MDR...

Divorce – Alleged Bigamy Raised in Financial Remedies Dispute

5th April, 2024 By

The issue of bigamy and its potential impact on a person's ability to seek financial remedies in a divorce came under the legal spotlight recently. A husband made an application to strike out his wife's financial remedies claim on the basis that she had committed bigamy and deceived him into a marriage when she knew she was not free to marry. This deceit, he claimed, was so egregious that, as a matter of public policy, she should be debarred from pursuing any claim for financial remedies against him. The husband based...