Land Compulsorily Purchased? You Are Entitled to Just Compensation

16th September 2022 By

If your land has been compulsorily purchased to make way for a public infrastructure project, you are entitled to full and fair compensation. Local authorities may be keen to pay as little as possible in such cases but, as an Upper Tribunal (UT) ruling showed, you are not required to take their lowest offer.

The case concerned a plot of land measuring just over 10 acres, most of which was used for grazing. Its owners were offered less than £300,000 in compensation after it was compulsorily acquired by a local authority to make way for an airport relief road. Dissatisfied with that offer, the owners sought a determination from the UT.

Ruling on the matter, the UT noted that the plot was in the Green Belt. Given the scarcity of land allocated for the construction of new homes in the area, however, there was a likelihood that Green Belt sites would at some point need to be freed for development in order to meet government housing targets.

Demand for housing was showing no signs of slackening, but the UT found that the plot nevertheless made a strong contribution to Green Belt purposes in checking the unrestricted sprawl of the large built-up area that it adjoined. The prospects of the plot’s development were therefore quite remote.

A prospective open market purchaser of the plot would nevertheless have an eye to the longer-term future. Such a purchaser would not discount from his bid the hope that the plot might one day benefit from residential planning permission. The UT ruled that the owners were entitled to a total of £584,971 in compensation.

Source: Concious

Latest News

Challenge to Will's Validity Rejected by High Court

12th April, 2024 By

The best way to ensure your assets will be distributed as you wish is to have your will professionally drafted by a qualified solicitor. In a recent case, a challenge to the validity of an elderly man's will was dismissed by the High Court. The man had previously made a will in 2011, leaving most of his estate equally to his three children. In 2018, by which time one of his sons had predeceased him, he made a further will, leaving the residue of his estate to his other son...

Defiance of Family Court Orders Will Always End Badly

10th April, 2024 By

Custodial sentences very rarely come into play in the family courts. Where there have been repeated breaches of court orders, however, judges may have little choice but to clamp down. This was illustrated in the High Court during committal proceedings that stemmed from a child custody dispute. The background to the case involved contested proceedings between the father and mother of a young child. These concluded with a court order establishing that the child – a daughter – would live with the mother. Three months later the daughter travelled with...

Claim for SDLT Relief on Annex Unsuccessful

8th April, 2024 By

When buying a property consisting of more than one residence, it may be possible to claim multiple dwellings relief (MDR) against Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT). However, there are certain conditions that must be met for an MDR claim to succeed, as a recent case illustrates. A property was purchased for £1.8 million. Prior to the purchase, the buyer had agreed with the seller that he would be allowed to carry out works to construct a self-contained annex at the property. The buyer's SDLT return included a claim for MDR...

Divorce – Alleged Bigamy Raised in Financial Remedies Dispute

5th April, 2024 By

The issue of bigamy and its potential impact on a person's ability to seek financial remedies in a divorce came under the legal spotlight recently. A husband made an application to strike out his wife's financial remedies claim on the basis that she had committed bigamy and deceived him into a marriage when she knew she was not free to marry. This deceit, he claimed, was so egregious that, as a matter of public policy, she should be debarred from pursuing any claim for financial remedies against him. The husband based...